My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
10/03/2023 Regular
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2023 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
10/3/2023 9:16:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
18
Date
10/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1768
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project <br />August 17, 2023 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />iii. The Metro EIR's Significance Threshold Is Inadequate <br />The CEQA Guidelines require that both temporary/periodic and permanent noise <br />impacts be identified and addressed. Exhibit B at 2; see CEQA Guidelines Appendix <br />G at 11; see also CEQA Guidelines §5 15126; 15126.2(a). However, the thresholds of <br />significance proposed in the Metro EIR would apply to operational (i.e. permanent) <br />noise impacts only. Exhibit B at 2; Metro EIR at 4.9-14. <br />Moreover, the Metro EIR contends that noise level increases less than 5 dba are <br />insignificant so long as the CNEL at sensitive receptors is below 65 dba. Id. However, <br />it would be quite possible for noise from the Project to exceed the allowed limits <br />according to the Santa Ana Municipal Code while remaining well below the proposed <br />CNEL 65 significance threshold. For example, as noted by noise expert Steve Rogers: <br />the nighttime noise limit in the Municipal Code for continuous noise — such as <br />air- conditioning — is 50 dBA (SAMC Section 18-312), for receivers where the <br />ambient (nighttime) noise level is less than 50 dBA, which is likely the case for <br />much of the Lake Dianne property. In this scenario, a continuous noise source <br />that runs 24-hours per day and produces 53 dBA on the neighboring property <br />would be out of compliance with the Municipal Code, but would result in a <br />CNEL of less than 60. <br />Accordingly, a subsequent EIR must be prepared which revises the threshold of <br />significance as follows: Any temporag orpermanent noise impact resulting from the <br />Project shall be considered significant if either one of the following conditions apply: (1) <br />the Project results in noise levels in excess of standards established in the City of <br />Santa Ana Municipal Code or General Plan; or (2) the Project results in a noise level <br />increase of 5 dBA or more. <br />iv. The Metro EIR's Construction Noise Analysis and Mitigation Measures <br />Must Be Revised <br />The Metro EIR states that the impact of noise due to construction in the overlay zone <br />could be substantial, even with mitigation, but that these impacts should be <br />considered less -than -significant because the noise of construction is temporary and <br />exempt from the noise limits in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Exhibit B at 3; Metro <br />EIR at 4.9-15. However, the characterization of construction noise impacts as less <br />than significant is inconsistent with the CEQA Guidelines since, as the Metro EIR <br />acknowledges, implementation of the Project may result in a significant adverse <br />City Council 18 — 294 10/3/2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.