Laserfiche WebLink
Ali Pezeshkpour, Planning Manager <br />Page 4 <br />requirements associated with "land use" and development standards.4 A concession <br />may be sought not only to modify or eliminate a development standard but also to <br />modify "zoning code requirements" (Gov. Code, § 65915, sub. (k)(1)). First, the <br />applicable zoning classification is simply "Multi -Family Dwellings" (i.e., not "Mixed - <br />Use"). Second, the ground floor commercial requirement is subordinate in function to <br />the primary zoning classification of "Multi -Family Dwellings," relating primarily to the <br />location of the commercial floor area. <br />If the applicant chooses to request a concession to eliminate or modify the requirement <br />for ground floor commercial, they may. The decision -making body must consider the <br />requested concession pursuant to the SDBL. The City must grant (i.e., "shall approve") <br />the specific incentives/concessions requested by the applicant unless the City makes <br />written findings, based on substantial evidence, that the incentive/concession would (1) <br />not result in a cost reduction, (2) have a specific adverse impact on health or safety (as <br />defined), or (3) be contrary to state or federal law (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (d)). <br />Because the City wrongfully rejected its concession request, the applicant has <br />removed the two ground floor residential units and replaced them with commercial floor <br />area. This has reduced the number of units in the overall project from 16 to 14, thus not <br />achieving the full 27.5-percent density bonus to which the applicant is entitled. The cost <br />of adding an additional story to the building to meet the ground floor commercial <br />requirement and providing 16 units is presumably economically infeasible. <br />Finally, the SDBL contains the directive that it "shall be interpreted liberally in favor of <br />producing the maximum number of total housing units" (Gov. Code, § 65915, subd. (r)). <br />Conclusion and Next Steps <br />HCD encourages the City's efforts to prioritize housing affordability and to increase the <br />overall supply of housing. However, the City must process development applications in <br />accordance with the timelines established under the PSA and the HAA. Failure to do <br />so results in project applications being deemed complete and consistent with local <br />regulatory requirements by operation of law, as seen here. Moving forward, HCD <br />expects the City to advance the Project to a meeting where it can be considered by the <br />decision -making body. <br />HCD would also like to remind the City that HCD has enforcement authority over the <br />SDBL, HAA, and PSA, among other state housing laws. Accordingly, HCD may review <br />local government actions and inactions to determine consistency with these laws. If <br />HCD finds that a city's actions do not comply with state law, HCD may notify the <br />California Office of the Attorney General that the local government is in violation of <br />state law (Gov. Code, § 65585, subd. (j)). <br />4 "Development Standard" is defined in Government Code section 65915, subdivision <br />(o)(2). <br />