My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Density Bonus Agreement No. 2023-01: 4th and Grand (1212 E. Fourth Street)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
10/17/2023 Regular
>
Item 23 - Density Bonus Agreement No. 2023-01: 4th and Grand (1212 E. Fourth Street)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2023 4:17:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2023 3:20:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
23
Date
10/17/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Density Bonus Agreement for 1212 E. Fourth Street <br />October 17, 2023 <br />Page 9 <br />Standard <br />Analysis <br />with a minimum dimension of six feet in each direction. The total common <br />open space required is 1,875 square feet and the total private open space <br />required is 750 square feet. <br />As proposed, the project provides 433 square feet of common interior space, <br />provided in the form of lobby space (approximately 3.5-percent of lot) to be <br />furnished (e.g., coffee tables, chairs, lounge tables, etc.), where feasible. The <br />project also provides 591 square feet of private open space, in the form of <br />private decks for nine units. The gross site area and existing site conditions <br />severely restrict the ability for the project to accommodate any common open <br />space, and restrict the ability to provide the fully required private open space. <br />Providing the required common open space standard would lead to the <br />elimination of three or more units, which would affect the feasibility to construct <br />the project. In order to maintain the current proposed unit count, the developer <br />would be required to construct additional floor levels or required to provide <br />underground parking, which would further increase development costs and <br />make the project financially infeasible. To help alleviate the common open <br />space deficiency, the project proposes an average of 40 square feet of private <br />open space per unit, through use of private balconies/decks. <br />Landscaping <br />Pursuant to Section 41-2020 of the TZC, all setbacks, yards, and shared <br />Standards <br />common open spaces are required to be landscaped. In addition, a landscape <br />buffer of not less than five feet is required to be provided to separate parking <br />lot from an adjacent properties and the surface parking lot is required to be <br />landscaped per City's commercial area standards. <br />As designed, the project provides a landscape buffer of two feet proposed <br />along the western property lines, three feet less than required. In addition, the <br />project does not provide the required landscape planters in the surface parking <br />lot. Due to site constraints, smaller than average lot size, and parking and <br />landscaping requirements, the required landscape buffer and landscape <br />planters cannot be accommodated. Maintaining the required landscape <br />standards would result in a site redesign, reducing the number of parking stall, <br />the drive aisle width, the ability of trash trucks to service the site, and ultimately <br />lead to the loss of bedroom units, resulting in the project becoming infeasible. <br />In order to provide the required landscaping and maintain the current proposed <br />unit count, the developer would be required to construct an additional level, <br />resulting in a different type of construction (steel -frame versus wood), or build <br />underground parking, further increasing development costs. <br />When analyzed cumulatively, the requested concessions and waivers could be avoided if <br />the project were designed on a different site or using a different site plan. If the project <br />were designed with a multi -level parking and/or subterranean parking structure, or if the <br />applicant used different building materials to construct a taller project, additional area on <br />site would become available to provide the ground floor commercial, minimum required <br />open space, landscaping, and the required building size and massing. <br />However, these changes would increase development costs, resulting in the housing <br />project becoming financially infeasible due to the significantly increased financial <br />implications of an alternative construction type compared to the relatively smaller scale of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.