My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Resolution in Support of the HOME Act (Carrillo-AB 1306)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/29/2023 Special
>
Item 18 - Resolution in Support of the HOME Act (Carrillo-AB 1306)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2023 12:50:57 PM
Creation date
10/25/2023 12:41:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
18
Date
8/29/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. 2023-XXX <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />2 <br />0 <br />2 <br />5 <br />4 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL 1306 (The HOME Act) <br />Whereas, refugees and immigrants are a vital part of California’s heart and identity, and the City <br />of Santa Ana recognizes the humanity of all people who call our community home, <br />Whereas, California’s criminal justice system unjustly and disproportionately harms Black, <br />Latinx, Indigenous, and Asian and Pacific Islander American communities. <br />Whereas, in recent years, the Legislature and California voters have demonstrated a strong <br />commitment to reforming our criminal system and ending mass incarceration by enacting various <br />landmark reforms. Through these reforms, certain incarcerated individuals have the opportunity <br />to be considered for resentencing or release. <br />Whereas, despite these reforms, when California’s prisons voluntarily and unnecessarily transfer <br />immigrant and refugee community members eligible for release from state custody to U.S. <br />Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for immigration detention and deportation <br />purposes, they subject these community members to double punishment and further trauma. This <br />double-punishment devastates families and deprives our communities of beloved leaders who are <br />eager to positively contribute to society. If not because of where they were born, these <br />community members would be allowed to return home to their families and communities. <br />Whereas, immigrant community members can be incarcerated by ICE, often for prolonged <br />periods and with no right to bail, and deported, permanently banishing them from the country, <br />from their families, their homes, their livelihoods and “all that makes life worth living.” Ng Fung <br />Ho v. White, 259 U.S. 276, 284 (1922). The Supreme Court has repeatedly acknowledged that <br />for many people, deportation is a more severe penalty than any jail sentence. See, e.g., Lee v. <br />United States, 137 S.Ct. 1958, 1968 (2017); Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 364 (2010). <br />Whereas, data shows that Black and Brown immigrants are disproportionately targeted by arrest, <br />detention, and deportation. <br />Whereas, when the California legislature passed criminal justice reforms previously, these <br />reforms were expected to save the state millions by reducing the length of draconian sentences. <br />However, when Californians who are immigrants earn release through these reforms, the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.