|
be provided to separate parking lot from an adjacent properties and
<br />the surface parking lot is required to be landscaped per City's
<br />commercial area standards.
<br />As designed, the project provides a landscape buffer of two feet
<br />proposed along the western property lines, three feet less than
<br />required. In addition, the project does not provide the required full-
<br />size landscape planters in the surface parking lot and instead
<br />provides partial and diamond -shaped planters. Due to site
<br />constraints, smaller than average lot size, and parking and
<br />landscaping requirements, the required landscape buffer and
<br />landscape planters cannot be accommodated. Maintaining the
<br />required landscape standards would result in a site redesign,
<br />reducing the number of parking stall, the drive aisle width, the
<br />ability of trash trucks to service the site, and ultimately lead to the
<br />loss of bedroom units, resulting in the project becoming infeasible.
<br />In order to provide the required landscaping and maintain the
<br />current proposed unit count, the developer would be required to
<br />construct an additional level, resulting in a different type of
<br />construction (steel -frame versus wood), or build underground
<br />parking, further increasing development costs.
<br />Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
<br />(CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
<br />prepared and certified in 2010 in order to address the potential environmental impacts
<br />associated with the Transit Zoning Code. A mitigation monitoring and reporting program
<br />(MMRP), findings of fact, and a statement of overriding consideration were adopted with
<br />the 2010 EIR. As proposed, the development is not anticipated to have additional
<br />environmental impacts not addressed in the 2010 EIR. Therefore, no additional
<br />environmental review will be required. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption,
<br />Environmental Review No. 2022-04 will be filed for this project. All applicable mitigation
<br />measures in the original EIR and associated MMRP will be enforced.
<br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City
<br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies,
<br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims,
<br />demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether
<br />legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative
<br />dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and
<br />such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"),
<br />brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
<br />departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to
<br />modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the
<br />City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and
<br />instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or
<br />concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown
<br />Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision
<br />Resolution 2023-068
<br />Page 6 of 12
<br />
|