My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 35 - FY 2022 Emergency Management Performance Grant
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
11/07/2023 Regular
>
Item 35 - FY 2022 Emergency Management Performance Grant
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 1:48:15 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 1:40:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Police
Item #
35
Date
11/7/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
305
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br />Award Determination and Obligation <br />Allocations <br />Risk Methodology <br />DHS defines risk as: “potential for an adverse outcome assessed as a function of hazard/threats, assets and <br />their vulnerabilities, and consequences.” See DHS Lexicon Terms and Definitions: 2017 Edition – <br />Revision 2, (Oct. 2017). The FEMA risk methodology is focused on three elements: <br />•Threat: the likelihood of an attack being attempted by an adversary; <br />•Vulnerability: the likelihood that an attack is successful, given that it is attempted; and <br />•Consequence: the effect of an event, incident, or occurrence. <br />Please see the applicable appendix of this Manual for each award program for specific information on the <br />risk methodology applied for each program. <br />Application Evaluation Criteria <br />Programmatic Criteria <br />See the Manual appendices and relevant program NOFOs for specific information on the application <br />criteria specific to each program. <br />Financial Integrity Criteria <br />Prior to making a federal award, FEMA is required by 31 U.S.C. § 3354, as enacted by the Payment <br />Integrity Information Act of 2019, Pub. L. No. 116-117 (2020); 41 U.S.C. § 2313; and 2 C.F.R. § 200.206 <br />to review information available through any Office of Management and Budget (OMB)-designated <br />repositories of governmentwide eligibility qualification or financial integrity information, including <br />whether the applicant is suspended or debarred. FEMA may also pose additional questions to the <br />applicant to aid in conducting the pre-award risk review. Therefore, application evaluation criteria may <br />include the following risk-based considerations of the applicant: <br />1.Financial stability; <br />2.Quality of management systems and ability to meet management standards; <br />3.History of performance in managing federal award; <br />4.Reports and findings from audits; and <br />5.Ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements. <br />All investments selected for recommendation will also undergo an additional risk review conducted by <br />the FEMA Grants Management Specialist to evaluate the risk for noncompliance in carrying out the <br />federal award. Using their subject-matter expertise, the questions the FEMA Grants Management <br />Specialist may assess include, but are not limited to: <br />•Is the applicant on any exclusion lists as identified in SAM.gov? <br />•If the applicant has received federal funding in the past, has the applicant performed all audits <br />required by the Single Audit requirements under 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart F? <br />•Has the applicant provided sufficient budget information and justification as required by the <br />NOFO? <br />•Are the costs proposed by the applicant in the budget information and justification allowable and <br />reasonable based on the criteria set forth in this Manual and the applicable appendix, NOFO, and <br />regulations?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.