My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 35 - FY 2022 Emergency Management Performance Grant
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
11/07/2023 Regular
>
Item 35 - FY 2022 Emergency Management Performance Grant
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 1:48:15 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 1:40:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Police
Item #
35
Date
11/7/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
305
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HSGP Appendix | 2023 Page A-2 <br />HSGP Funding Guidelines <br />Recipients must comply with all the requirements in 2 C.F.R. Part 200 (Uniform Administrative <br />Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards). In general, recipients should <br />consult with their FEMA HQ Preparedness Officer prior to making any investment that does not clearly <br />meet the allowable expense criteria. Funding guidelines established within this section support four of the <br />five mission areas—Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, and Response—and associated core capabilities <br />within the Goal. While Recovery is part of the Goal, it is not explicitly part of the HSGP. Allowable <br />investments made in support of the national priorities, as well as other capability-enhancing projects must <br />have a nexus to terrorism preparedness and fall into the categories of planning, organization, exercises, <br />training, or equipment, aligned to building capability, closing capability gaps, and/or sustaining <br />capabilities, as defined by CPG 201: THIRA/SPR Guide—3rd Edition (Comprehensive Preparedness <br />Guide (CPG) 201, 3rd Edition (fema.gov)). Recipients are encouraged to use grant funds for evaluating <br />grant-funded project effectiveness and return on investment. FEMA encourages recipients to provide the <br />results of that analysis to FEMA. <br />Multiple Purpose or Dual-Use of Funds <br />For both the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) and Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI), many <br />activities that support the achievement of core capabilities related to the national priorities and terrorism <br />preparedness may simultaneously support enhanced preparedness for other hazards unrelated to acts of <br />terrorism. However, all SHSP- and UASI-funded projects must assist recipients and subrecipients in <br />achieving core capabilities related to preventing, preparing for, protecting against, or responding to acts of <br />terrorism per section 2008(c) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. § 609(c)). <br />Planning (SHSP and UASI) <br />SHSP and UASI funds may be used for a range of emergency preparedness and management planning <br />activities, such as those associated with the development, review, and revision of the THIRA, SPR, <br />continuity plans, and other planning activities that support the Goal and placing an emphasis on updating <br />and maintaining a current Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) that conforms to the guidelines outlined in <br />Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101 v2. Planning efforts can also include conducting risk and <br />resilience assessments on increasingly connected cyber and physical systems, on which security depends, <br />using the Infrastructure Resilience Planning Framework and related Cybersecurity and Infrastructure <br />Security Agency (CISA) resources. <br />Additionally, SHSP and UASI funds may be used for planning efforts related to state court cybersecurity, <br />911 call capabilities, alert and warning capabilities, and implementation of the REAL ID Act (Pub. L. No. <br />109-13). <br />Organization (SHSP and UASI) <br />States and high-risk urban areas must justify proposed expenditures of SHSP or UASI funds to support <br />organization activities within their Investment Justification (IJ) submission. Organizational activities <br />include: <br />•Program management; <br />•Development of whole community partnerships, through groups such as Citizen Corp Councils; <br />•Structures and mechanisms for information sharing between the public and private sector; <br />•Implementing models, programs, and workforce enhancement initiatives to address <br />ideologically inspired radicalization to violence in the homeland;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.