My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #39
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
11/07/2023 Regular
>
Correspondence - #39
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 3:03:14 PM
Creation date
11/2/2023 8:38:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
39
Date
11/7/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana Mayor and City Council Page 2 <br />intent to confer charter cities with the same expansive authority over school board elections that they have <br />over municipal elections. Id. at 251-53, 256. Put another way, the court held that charter cities can expand <br />the vote in school district elections precisely because they have indisputably broad authority over <br />municipal elections. Charter cities' authority to determine who may participate in elections for municipal <br />officers is even clearer. See id. at 256-57. <br />City staff appear to be interpreting Lacy narrowly. In the staff report for Tuesday's meeting, I the <br />City Attorney quoted language from the opinion that, read alone, can be misconstrued as suggesting that <br />Santa Ana's authority to expand the electorate for municipal elections is unsettled. But the thrust of the <br />paragraph from which the quotes came, rather than limiting charter cities' power to determine who may <br />vote, warns that cities in exercising their power over local elections —must nevertheless be mindful not <br />to unduly infringe on or narrow the right to vote: <br />This conclusion does not leave charter cities with limitless authority to determine the <br />electorate for school board elections or, for that matter, the election of other municipal <br />officials. "[E]ven if a given matter is deemed to be a municipal affair, a charter city's <br />regulation remains subject to the various guarantees and requirements of the state and <br />federal Constitutions." [citation omitted]. Our conclusion leaves intact the application of <br />other constitutional "guarantees and requirements, "for example, the state and federal <br />equal protection clauses .... Similarly, as Proposition N expanded the franchise, we do <br />not opine on charter cities' ability to narrow it. We decide today solely the issue before <br />us: the Constitution confers on the City the authority to expand the electorate for school <br />board elections to include noncitizen parents or guardians of City children. <br />Id. at 259-60 (emphasis added). <br />In sum, the holding and reasoning in Lacy firmly support the legal authority of charter cities to <br />expand the electorate to noncitizen residents in municipal elections. The Lacy court unequivocally held <br />that the Constitution's voter qualification requirements are not a roadblock to expanding the electorate, <br />reasserted that the Home Rule Provision gives charter cities like Santa Ana broad authority over <br />municipal elections, and emphasized that this authority "permits the voters of each charter city to <br />determine whether [noncitizen voting] is good policy for their city or not." Id. at 243. There is thus no <br />reason to deny Santa Ana voters the opportunity to decide whether it makes sense to expand the electorate <br />in their local elections. <br />Santa Ana Has a Roadmap for Successfully Implementing Noncitizen Voting <br />The process of creating San Francisco's noncitizen voting program shows that it is possible to <br />develop a successful program when a jurisdiction is proactive and committed to working collaboratively <br />with the immigrant community and nonprofit partners. Since the adoption of Proposition N, San <br />Francisco has been working closely with advocates to ensure that noncitizen residents are protected and <br />can make an informed decision for themselves about whether to vote.' For example, San Francisco has <br />registration forms and ballots specific to noncitizens so that those residents only register and vote in <br />authorized elections.' The San Francisco Department of Elections also provides voters with a "Right to <br />p City y .h //: dl td dsn p,trcllll� �;ov.coi:llu/�porVaI/viewer <br />Nov. 7, 2023 Staff Report re Item #39, CI Attorney Office at 2, <br />id' .. h akc .i:.�'.1j.�.:.:..::::0. <br />2 Ron Hayduk, Megan Dias, and Olivia Marti, Immigrant Voting and the Movement for Inclusion in San Francisco, <br />Chinese for Affirmative Action and Immigrant Voting Parent Collaborative at 17-25, (Sept. 2023), htru p,,................................................... e y Z�Yp,z <br />�r�P2�nu/rA Flo a8s/2Q;12 ;/QD 3/2 ; CAA j)orV. -C 2 1pajf (providing an overview of the efforts between San <br />Francisco and community advocates to develop noncitizen voting program). <br />s See, e.g., Non -citizen Voter Registration Form for Nov. 2019 San Franscisco School Board Election, <br />hutrp�://�l'�;lec.tra��n faaw a» /sits /deli r�lu/lily /I a�c:rA�;u,��nu /�Te,ur�n /�T2; N/oter%2uDRe1;iS11_dui0D 1ic.11110D )df- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.