My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 07 - Response to OC Grand Jury Report_ Historic Rain, Yet Drought
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
11/21/2023 Regular
>
Item 07 - Response to OC Grand Jury Report_ Historic Rain, Yet Drought
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2023 2:21:31 PM
Creation date
11/29/2023 2:21:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
11/21/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HISTORIC RAIN, YET DROUGHT REMAINS <br /> <br /> <br />ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 39 of 57 <br />The largest water banking project <br />underway that affects Orange <br />County is the Santa Ana River <br />Conservation and Conjunctive <br />Use Program (SARCCUP). It is a <br />regional program that involves <br />several agencies in Orange <br />County, Riverside County, and <br />San Bernardino County. While a <br />logical program to undertake, <br />there are technical and <br />distribution issues that must be <br />worked out and these items may <br />take several years. <br /> <br />A more controversial banking program is <br />the Cadiz project. The Cadiz Water <br />Project is a water supply project to <br />manage the groundwater basin underlying <br />a portion of the Cadiz and Fenner Valleys <br />in California’s Mojave Desert. At least one <br />water agency in Orange County has <br />considered this program as a potential <br />source of water to meet their needs. The <br />program has been promoted since 1997 <br />and has yet to move forward. There are several environmental concerns with the <br />program and concerns about transferring water between basins, particularly one under <br />a desert. The Cadiz project currently is not viable supply of water. <br /> <br />There are criticisms of water banking and its effect on local communities. A Georgetown <br />Environmental Law Review article in March 2022 stated, “While advocates of water <br />banking believe its market-based approach will efficiently allow a reduction of use of <br />water, especially during droughts, opponents may cite some examples of how letting the <br />market take over may be detrimental to local communities.” Such concerns are valid <br />and need to be considered prior to relying on water banking as the only solution to <br />ensure water supply during times of drought. <br /> <br />Purchase of water rights <br /> <br />Temporary transfers of water from one water user to another have been used <br />increasingly as a way of meeting statewide water demands, particularly in drought <br />years. This has been done through the purchase of water rights. There are numerous <br />articles concerning the possible negative effects of this practice, including the effects on <br />less wealthy communities and agricultural. Due to these concerns, this practice should <br />be limited. Farms in western Arizona are growing alfalfa – one of the most water-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.