Laserfiche WebLink
HISTORIC RAIN, YET DROUGHT REMAINS <br /> <br /> <br />ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 I 2023 Page 44 of 57 <br />Utilization of other supplies <br />Besides the North/Central Orange County aquifer and those obtained from Metropolitan <br />Water District, there are other insignificant supplies of water. These include surface <br />water captured in Irvine Lake and the San Juan Creek Groundwater Basin in South <br />Orange County. Neither of these are significant supplies of water. <br /> <br />Water Efficiency to Increase Supply <br />Orange County Water Districts have found they can reduce the immediate need for <br />increasing water supplies by more efficient use of water. This certainly stretches the <br />water supplies, but it is limited in its ability. Future water needs will require more than <br />just efficient water use. <br /> <br />During the recent drought from 2011 to late 2022, Orange County Water Suppliers <br />reduced the per-capita water use significantly by more efficient water use and <br />conservation. This has allowed development to continue to occur even as the water <br />supply was reduced. <br /> <br />Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) customers reduced their water use from 89 gallons <br />per capita in 2007 to 67 gallons per capita in 2021.31 The area served by IRWD is a <br />newer area where much of the landscaping is irrigated by recycled water and is drought <br />tolerant. The IRWD also has extensive use of water saving plumbing in homes. Older <br />areas of Orange County have also reduced per-capita water use. North and Central <br />Orange County reduced water use from 330 acre-feet in water year 1999-2000 to 230 <br />acre-feet in water year 2022-202332 while the population grew slightly.33 <br /> <br />Water efficiency savings have been achieved by adopting water saving devices, <br />changes in landscape practices, greater recycling of water, tiered water rates (higher <br />users, higher rates) and the public’s participation. Water suppliers have worked with <br />users to identify the need for greater efficiency by promoting these changes. The State <br />of California also mandated a 20 percent reduction in urban per-capita water use by <br />2020 in the Water Conservation Act of 2009. <br /> <br />The change to efficient use of water will need to become the future standard as water <br />supplies diminish and as housing development increases. However, it is not reasonable <br />to expect greater efficiency to make up for the reduction in supply caused by climate <br />change. Several of the interviewees and many of the reference documents the Grand <br />Jury reviewed stated Orange County cannot conserve its way out of a drought. <br /> <br />Besides the significant reduction in per-capita water use, greater savings may be made <br />by more drastic changes in lifestyle. None of the information supplied by water <br />suppliers and reviewed by the Grand Jury addressed these changes. As an example of <br />lifestyle changes, areas such as Phoenix and Las Vegas have either adopted or are in <br />the process of adopting drastic restrictions on landscape water use as a long-term