Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2023-xx <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />objectives, the Project is thereby inconsistent with the City’s General Plan. <br />Moreover, Section 4.1.1 of the MEMU (Village Center Core: Pedestrian- <br />Oriented Design and Active Ground-Floor Uses) requires that the “ground <br />floor of buildings fronting on Fourth Street between Cabrillo Park Drive <br />and Park Center Drive, and Golden Circle Drive south of Fourth Street as <br />shown on Figure 2 shall have commercial uses and pedestrian-oriented <br />designs.” As the project contains residential uses on the ground floor of <br />Cabrillo Park Drive, the project does not satisfy this objective design <br />criterion of the MEMU. <br />G. Pursuant Section 8.2 of the MEMU, granting of a MEMU Overlay Zone <br />Site Plan Review approval is subject to four findings: <br />a. That the proposed development plan is consistent with and will <br />further the objectives outlined in Section 1.2 for the MEMU. <br />b. That the proposed development plan is consistent with the <br />development standards specified in Section 4 of the MEMU. <br />c. That the proposed development plan is designed to be compatible <br />with adjacent development in terms of similarity of scale, height, <br />and site configuration and otherwise achieves the objectives of the <br />Design Principles specified in Section 5 of the MEMU overlay <br />district. <br />d. That the land use uses, site design, and operational considerations <br />in the proposed development plan have been planned in a manner <br />that will result in a compatible and harmonious operation as <br />specified in Section 7 of the MEMU overlay district. <br />H. Pursuant to Section 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act (SMA) <br />and Section 34-132(c) of the SAMC, one or more of the following findings <br />must be established in order to deny a tentative map application: <br />a. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general <br />and specific plans as specified in Section 65451. <br />b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not <br />consistent with applicable general and specific plans. <br />c. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. <br />d. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of <br />development. <br />e. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements <br />are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or <br />substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.