My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item HA3 - Agreement with Iron Mountain, LLC
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
12/05/2023 Regular & HA
>
Item HA3 - Agreement with Iron Mountain, LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2023 3:32:27 PM
Creation date
12/1/2023 3:24:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
HA3
Date
12/5/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Subcontractors <br />Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting <br />all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that Entity is an <br />additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. <br /> <br />Special Risks or Circumstances <br />Entity reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of <br />the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. <br /> <br />X. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will evaluate <br />proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions <br />and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br /> <br />B. Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following criteria: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />C. A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank Proposers. <br />Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only those <br />proposals receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves the <br />right to award the contract to any proposer(s) with a score above 70. The review committee <br />will evaluate proposers based on their response to the RFP and the City evaluation criteria <br />set forth above. <br /> <br />D. The City is under no obligation to accept any proposal and reserves the right to negotiate <br />with respondents as to fees and terms. The City may reject proposals at its sole discretion. <br />If proposal fails to satisfy any requirements outlined in this RFP, it may be considered non- <br />responsive and may be rejected. <br /> <br />The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced proposals, but will make awards <br />in the best interests of the City after all factors have been evaluated. <br /> <br />CATEGORY POINTS <br />Responsiveness to RFP <br /> Proposal’s compliance with the requirements of this RFP. <br /> Scope of Services offered including ability to provide optional services. <br /> The value to any new and/or innovative product or service suggestions or <br />other new ideas and enhancements. <br />10 <br />Experience of Firm and Personnel <br /> The experience, resources, and qualifications of the firm and individuals <br />assigned to this account, including manager, supervisor and assigned <br />staff. <br />60 <br />Cost of Proposal <br /> Value of cost in relation to services provided. 25 <br />References <br /> References that are similar in size and project scope to the City. 5 <br />TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE 100 <br />EXHIBIT 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.