Correspondence #44 - Sanitation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Alcala, Abigail From: mhill realonomics.com < Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2024 10:41 AM To: eComment Subject: Written Protest "City of Santa Ana Sanitation Services Users Charge Adjustments" Importance: High Address: Property Owner: Harvard Properties Property Manager: Realonomics Corporation 2816 E. Coast Hwy 41 Corona del Mar 92625 I am writing to vehemently protest the proposed increase in Sanitation Services in the City of Santa Ana. As a manager overseeing approximately 100 units of commercial and industrial property, the mandatory utilization of a single vendor for sanitation services without the freedom to explore competitive alternatives is a severe injustice imposed upon us. The exorbitant cost enforced by Republic Services, the sole mandated sanitation company, is nothing short of extortionate. Permit me to present a glaring comparison: In the neighboring city of Costa Mesa, for identical services comprising a 6-yard bin and recycling provision six days a week, the cost stands at a mere $240 per month. Astonishingly, under Republic Services in Santa Ana, we are subjected to a staggering $1300 for the same level of service. Such a disproportionate fee structure is indefensible and reeks of exploitation. The financial burden this places upon property owners is unconscionable. The year-end total for 2023 for the property under protest (Parcel#: 408-152-38 and 408-152-39) amounted to a staggering $37,374.73. This financial pillage severely impacts property owners, particularly in an area characterized by lower income demographics. It is imperative to recognize that this unjust escalation in costs significantly burdens those who can least afford it. I implore you to reconsider not only the proposed rate increase but also the mandated restriction that confines us solely to Republic Services. The absence of options and the absence of competitive pricing violate the basic principles of fair market practices. Allowing property owners, the agency to explore and negotiate alternative, more affordable sanitation services is not only fair but essential in rectifying this evident injustice. The current system not only perpetrates financial harm but also undermines the principles of fairness and justice within our community. It is time for change. I beseech you to prioritize the welfare of Santa Ana's population by revisiting the rate increase proposal and enabling us to advocate for ourselves in securing more reasonable sanitation service options. Sincerely, Molly Hill