My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence #44 - Sanitation
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
02/20/2024
>
Correspondence #44 - Sanitation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2024 5:12:58 PM
Creation date
1/3/2024 12:54:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
2/20/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
01 /07/2023 <br />Owner's Property Address: <br /> <br />Santa Ana CA 92701 <br />Protest against proposed changes to the City of Santa Ana Sanitation Services Users Charge <br />To whom it may concern, <br />I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed changes in the sanitation services <br />users charge, specifically the staggering increase from the current rate of $5.35 per unit to the <br />proposed $11.72 per month per unit, with additional annual increases of approximately 50 <br />cents. <br />This proposed hike places an unreasonable financial burden on the residents of our city. Such <br />a drastic increase in fees could significantly impact individuals and families, particularly those <br />already facing economic challenges. It is essential to consider the broader implications of these <br />changes on the community's well-being. <br />Furthermore, the lack of transparent communication and justification for such a substantial <br />raise is deeply concerning. A comprehensive breakdown outlining the necessity and specifics <br />behind this sharp increase is imperative for us, the users, to understand and evaluate the <br />reasons behind this proposal. <br />Moreover, the annual increment of approximately 50 cents per unit is unsustainable and <br />exacerbates the financial strain on residents, especially considering the already high proposed <br />initial charge. There should be a more equitable and gradual approach to any fee adjustments <br />that consider the economic realities of our community. <br />I urge you to reconsider and reassess this proposal, taking into account the impact it will have <br />on residents and their livelihoods. It's crucial to engage the community in these decisions and <br />seek alternative solutions that do not unduly burden the people. <br />Sincerely, <br />Viviana Olivares <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.