Laserfiche WebLink
Item 27 Comments RE. Hotel -Related Zoning Amendment <br />January 16, 2024 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />5. THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER A HOTEL -SPECIFIC CUP, JUST LIKE THE CITY OF Los ANGELES <br />While the Staff Report urges less hotel development oversight by the elected City Council, <br />other cities see the need for more oversight to mitigate potential negative impacts, such as the City <br />of Los Angeles, which recently passed a new CUP requirement (appealable to its City Council) for all <br />hotels proposed in Hollywood and Downtown Los Angeles.15 This measure was passed by the Los <br />Angeles City Council by a 14-0 vote and includes important provisions to help ensure hotels do not <br />improperly displace housing and other conditions that help ensure sustainable and responsible <br />hotel development (e.g., a sufficient market demand, reduce impacts to workers and housing needs, <br />encourage hiring of local workers and reduced VMTs, supporting local business, etc.). However, the <br />proposed ZOA does the very opposite by making full -service hotels (which are ubiquitous in today's <br />market) permitted by right in many areas of the City in which such development currently would <br />not be allowed without a zone change, CUP, or other types of discretionary approval from the City <br />and subject to environmental review. Respectfully, this is simply the wrong direction for Santa Ana. <br />In conclusion, Local 11 respectfully requests the City Council strike and remove the hotel - <br />related provisions of the ZOAs—specifically Sections 7 through 20 and ExhibitsA and B of the updated <br />ZOA included in the Executive Director's Memorandum dated January 11, 2024. <br />Local 11 reserves the right to supplement these comments at future ZOA hearings and <br />proceedings. (See Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist. (1997) 60 <br />Cal.AppAth 1109, 1120 [CEQA litigation not limited only to claims made during EIR comment <br />period].) This office requests, to the extent not already on the notice list, all notices of CEQA actions <br />and any approvals, Project CEQA determinations, or public hearings to be held on the Project under <br />state or local law requiring local agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written <br />request for them. (See Pub. Res. Code §§, 21092.2, 21167(f) and Gov. Code § 65092.) Please send <br />notice by electronic and regular mail to Jordan R. Sisson, Esq., 801 S. Grand Avenue, 11th Floor, LA, <br />CA 90017 (Jordan@gideonlaw.net). <br />Thank you for your consideration of these comments. We ask that this letter be placed in <br />the Project's administrative record. <br />Sincerely, <br />LAW OFFICE OF GIDEON KRACOV <br />. . <br />an R. Sisson )) <br />rney fot' UNITYTIERE Loca111 <br />15 See Council File No. 21-0934 (showing Hollywood hotel CUP amendments made and adopted by Council on <br />5/3/23), https://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfni?fa=ccfi.viewrecord&cfnumber=21-0934; <br />see also Amending Motion 53B (showing CUP language), https://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2021/21- <br />0934_misc_amd'YO2053B_kre_sm_5-3-23.pdf, Council File No. 22-0617 (same for Downtown hotel CUP), <br />https://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfni?fa=ccfi.viewrecord&cfnumber=22-0617; see also <br />Amending Motion 54 D (same as above), https://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2022/22- <br />0617_misc_amd(YO2 054 D_kre_price_5 -3-2 3.pdf/. <br />