Laserfiche WebLink
Law offices of <br />KENT G. SNYDER <br />AIJORNEY AT LAW <br />Kf',NT G. SNYDER 2301 DUPON-FDRIVE, SU11T, 430 <br />KATHLEEN A. KELLY ( 949) 83 , ; Q0 78 <br />IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92612 klN: <br />kejit@ker)t-,nyderlaw.com <br />kath I cen (ii,,keo <br />Ms. Sonia R, Carvalho <br />C it y Atto ;Aa-j <br />22 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, California 92701 <br />Re: Venda Item for Vacation of <br />FloLyer Itreet Santa Anay, CA ley In 'Floral Park between 2383 N. Flower, and 2379 N <br />[r")ear Ms. Carvalho� <br />I have been engaged by two of the residents of Floral Park to represent thern in the abovei-sUbject <br />matter which comes before the City Council on August 15, 2023. My clients are firene Myers of 2,393 <br />NFlower Street, and Cheryl Newton of 2379 N. Flower Street. My clients oppose the ApplicatioM <br />I am writing to you about an error in the Application. The error is in the Title Guarantee issued 1,�)y <br />Cfflcago Title Company, Attached to this letter please find a copy of an email between Colin Donn(-�Hy <br />arid the Title Company dated November 16, 2022 at the time the first draft of the Title Report <br />Guarantee was issued, <br />My observations. of this email reveal: <br />1) The Title Off lcer was correct in the first draft that he produced'of the Title Report Guarant'l <br />in that he included item: 6 which says "the righits of the public to use that portion of the a lk <br />adjoining said lot 57 on the south!, until such t�ime said alley is yLacated to t.he q4lit'"byti-le <br />City of Santa Ana, -e ..= <br />2) The Title Officer was correct in the above statement because this is a dedicated roadway as <br />stated in the language in the upper right-hand corner of the recorded rnap forTract 75/1 <br />which was recorded in 1925 and it says that all streets and roadways are dedicated for puWic <br />use, The ai:lley fits within this category. <br />3) The alley was dedicated to the City for the use by the Publlic in fee simple absolute, it was <br />not then, has never been, and is not now any portion of Lot 57, Lot S7 lies contiguous tc) thi <br />alley, bu,t three other lots also lie contiguous to the, alley. Ms, Newton's lot, plus two 10[,S <br />which front onto Heliotrople, Mr. Donnelly intentionally suborned the Title Officer to state <br />Z10" <br />