My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
01/16/2024 Regular & Special HA & Special SA
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 11:33:12 AM
Creation date
1/23/2024 11:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
1/16/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project <br />CEQA Exemption 15183 <br />4.7 Geology and Soils <br />4.7.1 GPU EIR Findings <br />The GPU EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update would be <br />subject to potential seismic -related hazards including strong seismic ground shaking, seismic - <br />related ground failure, and landslides. Further, development associated with the General Plan <br />Update could result in unstable geologic unit or soil conditions, including soil erosion, expansive <br />soils, settlement and collapse, and subsidence. However, implementation of RR G-1, through G- <br />3 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, RR G-1 and G-2 require <br />development to comply with the most recent version of the California Building Code and Municipal <br />Code Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures, and RR G-3 requires all buildings or structures within <br />the City that require plumbing fixtures be connected to a public sewer per Municipal Code Section <br />39-51, Mandatory Connections. The GPU EIR also concluded that development under the <br />General Plan Update could impact known and unknown paleontological resources through <br />grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more <br />intensive soil excavation than in the past. Therefore, Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO- <br />3 require monitoring based on the sensitivity level of sites for paleontological resources. Overall, <br />the GPU EIR concluded that implementation of regulatory requirements and Mitigation Measures <br />GEO-1 through GEO-3 would reduce geology and soil impacts to less than significant levels. <br />4.7.2 Project Analysis <br />The project site is located in a seismically active area, as is most of southern California. However, <br />the project site is not located within a State -designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone. The <br />nearest fault to the project site is the Bolsa-Fairview Fault (Newport -Inglewood Rose Canyon fault <br />zone), located approximately 5.5 miles to the southwest. No active faults are known to cross the <br />project site. Additionally, the site is not located in an area identified as a potential landslide hazard <br />area by the State or City. However, the project site is located within an area susceptible to <br />liquefaction. As described above, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce impacts in <br />this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance with <br />existing regulations would ensure the proposed project would not result in a significant impact <br />related to seismic hazards or liquefaction. <br />Construction of the proposed project would involve minimal ground -disturbing activities given the <br />nature of the proposed improvements. As mentioned above, while construction activities may <br />result in the potential for erosion to occur, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce <br />impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance <br />with existing regulations including implementation of regulatory requirements would ensure the <br />proposed project would not result in a significant impact related to erosion. No new or substantially <br />more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new <br />mitigation measures are required. <br />Lateral spreading is a type of liquefaction -induced ground failure on mildly sloping ground. <br />However, the project site is located on relatively level ground, and implementation of the proposed <br />project would not increase the risk of landslides. Therefore, no impacts related to lateral spreading <br />would occur. Subsidence is the lowering of surface elevation due to changes occurring <br />underground, such as the extraction of large amounts of groundwater. The proposed project <br />would not involve the extraction of any groundwater, oil, or gas from the project site. Clay -based <br />soils are typically susceptible to expansion. The geologic materials under the project site have <br />very low expansive potential (plasticity index value less than 15) and are classified as non - <br />Dec i y ouncil 26 — 86 1/16/20'2 e 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.