My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
02/20/2024
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2024 5:06:06 PM
Creation date
2/7/2024 9:28:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/6/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KENT G. SNYDER <br />KATHLEEN A. KELLY <br />kent@)kentsflyderIaw.com: <br />Law qffices of <br />YCENT G. SNYDER <br />ATTORNEY ATLAW <br />2301 DUPONTI)RIVE, SUITE 430 <br />IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92612 <br />February 1, 2024 <br />Ms. Sonia R. Carvalho <br />City Attorney, City of Santa Ana <br />22 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa, Ana, Cal i fom i a 92 701 <br />I ON-W 0 WE, =1I ffa <br />(9,49) 833-9078 <br />Fax: (949) 833-8209 <br />kadileeiiCii),keritsflyderlaw.coni <br />On behalf of my clients, I have written to you at various times in August 2023, <br />concerning the above matter. That matter has now been calendared for the City <br />Council on the evening of February 20, 2024. In that connection, I have received <br />a draft report from the City Staff ("Draft Report"), which is undated, but it is this <br />Draft Report that the following comments relate to. <br />I know the Staff is well-meaning and hard-working, but I must object to theDraf-1 <br />Report in one very important area where the Draft Report is in fact completely <br />wrong, and the Staff completely ignored the letters that I have written to you. <br />My comments are as follows: <br />1. The previous City Council resolution 2023-40 was adopted by the City <br />Council before any Notice had been given to the residents surrounding the <br />alley. There are four (4) residences abutting the: alley and one addition,,]] <br />resident that has an easement to the alley. Three (3) of the four (4) <br />residences abutting the alley oppose the resolution to vacate a portion of the <br />alley. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.