My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
03/19/2024
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2024 11:55:05 AM
Creation date
3/6/2024 4:02:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
3/19/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 4, 2024 <br />Dear Santa Ana City Council Members, <br />At the recent March meeting of the G7 Neighborhood Leaders Alliance, a group of leaders from <br />17 different neighborhoods in Santa Ana, voiced a serious concern that a once in a generation <br />proposal to transform an aging shopping center into a vibrant new landmark in south Santa <br />Ana, generating hundreds of millions of dollars in community benefits, sorely needed tax <br />revenue for the City, thousands of jobs, 13 acres of open space, and $2.913 in economic stimulus <br />is slipping away —and quickly! <br />Without immediate action to advance formal hearings to consider the Related Bristol project, <br />which offers an unprecedented opportunity, the likes of which has been rarely proposed in our <br />City's 154-year history, the developer may be forced to pause their efforts indefinitely or <br />abandon the Project altogether. If that occurs, the opportunity to create 7,500 new <br />construction and permanent jobs, many of them local hires, and generate $500 million in net <br />surplus revenue to the City in the first 30 years of the Project, could be lost. <br />Also at risk is the project's $535 million community benefits package, including 13 acres of <br />actively programmed open space, a police substation, and $80 million of offsite public <br />infrastructure improvements (that our city does not have sufficient resources to fund) but <br />Related has agreed to provide as part of their Project. The enormity of this opportunity can't be <br />overstated with the total package of proposed community benefits; about three times the <br />required amount for a Project of this size and scale. <br />By all accounts, the developer, Related California, has done everything possible, and more, to <br />move the Project forward expeditiously in advance of major deadlines. We are increasingly <br />concerned that the City's Development Agreement Ad Hoc Committee protocols have proven <br />inefficient, ineffective and are the primary cause behind the project's delays and issues that now <br />threaten the Project's viability, including the expiration of nearly 100 retail leases in 2025 on the <br />existing site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.