Laserfiche WebLink
The Network <br />for Public Health Law <br />Ideas. <br />Experience. <br />Practical Answers. <br />April 16, 2024 <br />Honorable Santa Ana City Councilmembers: <br />The Network — Harm Reduction Legal Project <br /> <br />Edina, Minnesota 55435 <br /> <br /> <br />On behalf of the Harm Reduction Legal Project, I am pleased to provide this letter in support of the Harm <br />Reduction Institute's (HRI) application to provide harm reduction services in Santa Ana and to encourage <br />the Council to reject the proposed resolution against HRI. The Harm Reduction Legal Project is an <br />initiative of the Network for Public Health Law, and provides actionable information, guidance, and <br />support to policymakers, health agencies, providers, and advocates working to create more just, <br />equitable, and health -focused drug policy in the Unites States. <br />We believe that California's authorization process for syringe services programs (SSPs) is careful, <br />thorough, and preempts local law. State authorization is necessary in areas where local government is <br />hesitant to endorse much -needed harm reduction practices. Drug -related harm knows no borders — <br />infectious disease and overdose deaths anywhere in California affects all Californians. We urge you to <br />reject the proposed resolution against HRI and instead work together with HRI to bring the best evidence - <br />based harm reduction policies possible to Santa Ana and become a model community for other cities in <br />California. <br />According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 109,000 <br />Americans died from a drug overdose in 2022. These deaths are overwhelmingly caused the presence of <br />illicit fentanyl in the illegal opioid supply. Participants in syringe services programs (SSPs) are more likely <br />to stop using drugs — new users of SSPs are five times more likely to enter drug treatment than those <br />who do not use an SSP. Those who do not stop using drugs but participate in an SSP are three times <br />more likely to reduce their injection frequency. <br />SSPs also greatly reduce the transmission of disease and save health care costs, all while causing no <br />increase in illegal drug use or crime. Further, the scientific literature is clear that syringe services <br />programs reduce syringe litter in areas where they are implemented. Eliminating SSPs does not stop <br />people from using drugs. <br />HRI's proposed operating plan, with CDPH's endorsement, addresses the County's Local Health Officer <br />mitigation recommendations mentioned in the Resolution's discussion section: <br />(1) demonstrating safe and effective methods of appropriate syringe disposal and collection; <br />(2) providing counseling services, linkage to behavior health and medical services, and provide <br />follow-up to referrals placed; and <br />(3) community collaboration, data collection, and monitoring to identify positive and negative <br />impacts <br />