My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 25
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
04/16/2024
>
Correspondence - Item 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2024 7:51:51 AM
Creation date
4/11/2024 4:39:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flores, Dora <br />From:Sheri Menke <sherimenke@gmail.com> <br />Sent:Sunday, April <br />To:eComment <br />Subject:Vote NO on item #25 <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Dear Mayor & Council Persons, <br /> <br />Reject Item #25 and ask the staff to study the issue and present a more detailed and accurate study on short term <br />rentals! This is what the city council asked the staff to do in 2015 and to this date it has not happened publicly. <br /> <br />The urgent ordinance that would prohibit short term rentals failed twice on April 2nd. All three votes had a <br />different outcome. This shows it is a complicated issue, that should take research, conversations and <br />negotiations! Instead of a citywide ban please tax and regulate short term rentals for the best interest of the city <br />and residents. Thousands of residents in Santa Ana will be affected by your vote this Tuesday! I have been <br />involved with short term rentals for ten years now in Santa Ana and have a wealth of knowledge to share with <br />you! <br /> <br />I heard three criticisms about STR’s on April 2nd. The first being that they are a nuisance creating parking <br />issues, trash and noise. While these things are a concern, the problem isn’t short term rentals, but rather <br />irresponsible landlords. These things could happen and do happen with long term rentals as well. This could be <br />solved with regulations. <br /> <br />Another concern was quality of life. Vacation rentals do add to the quality of life for both the owner, the <br />traveler and even the neighbors/neighborhoods! I was the neighbor of a short term rental and it changed my life <br />for the better! I became more aware and understanding of the world through speaking to the travelers and <br />learning more about their cultures, languages and traditions. My employees have a better quality of life because <br />I am able to pay them a fair and livable wage. Those who have homes where mortgages are high and they rent <br />out a room have a better quality of life because they can afford to live. There was one time woman in 2016 who <br />lived in a four bedroom home in West Foral Park who rented rooms in her home periodically as STR’s. Her <br />kids were grown, her husband had passed and she didn’t need the money, but rather needed the companionship. <br />She was lonely and loved hosting folks to talk and learn their stories. STR’s contributed greatly to her quality of <br />life! There are a lot of circumstances to consider when it comes to quality of life. <br /> <br />Lastly, the concern about short term rentals was housing shortages. Again, one cannot blame housing shortages <br />on STR’s as there has always been housing shortages. Those who use their income to pay their mortgages will <br />lose their homes which will only contribute to the housing shortage. Again, if there were permits and <br />regulations there would be a “cap” on how many are allowed in the city. <br /> <br />There was a study on short term rentals presented to the planning commission in December of 2022. However, <br />the public couldn’t speak during the study. The commissioners of the building and planning department were <br />overwhelmingly supportive of a taxed and regulated program, NOT a ban. This urgent ordinance did not get <br />passed through the planning commission before being presented to you. The process is not being done fairly or <br />accurately! <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.