My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
05/07/2024
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2024 2:25:22 PM
Creation date
4/29/2024 3:28:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be “raised by” iPads. “Get offline. It is not alcohol, it is not porn, it is not weed, it is not blah blah, it is being <br />online. Get offline,” wrote a Reddit user on <br /> <br />Not so long ago, the default position, if one were an internet-savvy older person beginning to feel queasy when <br />noticing groups of kids bent over their phones, was to say to oneself, “Well, that’s life; once, Socrates feared <br />print’s effect on memory, and now, I fear this.” One definitely didn’t say out loud, online, <br /> <br />“The kids shouldn’t have phones,” unless one were writing for the Atlantic. A weary “it has always been <br />thus” pose toward the topic was in order—television, Walkmans, rock music, the youths are always up to <br />something the adults think is stupid. Some of the resistance to wagging a finger at kids and phones was a totally <br />fair allergy to generational analysis; another part of it was probably self-defense. <br /> <br />“Some of us really don’t like our screen time habits criticized,” Taylor wrote in a follow-up Substack analyzing <br />the replies to her recent “it’s the phones” provocation on X. “Others may think they appear smarter by <br />highlighting other issues, that they can see above the fray and observe the macro trends that are really shaping <br />our lives, not that stupid anti-phone rhetoric we hear from the Boomers.” It’s not the phones; it’s the lack of <br />third spaces, the omnipresent car culture, the inequality. That defensive pose? I know it well, because I was <br />adept at it—in 2019 I described concern over teens and social media as “alarmist.” <br /> <br />Things are different in 2024. Yes, we have new data on the shape of the mental-health crisis among teens, and <br />especially teenage girls, and how it’s worsened since phones got front-facing cameras and platforms became <br />dominant. But the biggest shift doesn’t come from looking at new data; it’s from experience. <br /> <br />More and more people have a boomer relative who was radicalized on Facebook, a grandma who won’t look up <br />from her phone during family visits, or a Gen X partner adept at the art of phubbing. We, who are supposed to <br />enjoy grown-adult levels of impulse control, have had trouble sleeping due to doomscrolling, spent Zoom <br />meetings looking at Instagram, or gotten into weird fights with strangers on Reddit that derailed us emotionally <br />for far too long. <br /> <br />We, ourselves, with our developed brains, have felt like flies on sticky paper when it comes to social media; of <br />course, children, still forming their selves and navigating the pitfalls of pre-adulthood, may be affected by it too. <br />“Kids probably shouldn’t have smartphones” has lost its generational sting. It has come to look more and more <br />like common sense. <br /> <br />Into this apparently promising moment comes social psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s new book, The Anxious <br />Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Caused an Epidemic of Mental Illness. Its compact thesis: <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.