My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2024-06-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
06/04/2024
>
Agenda Packet_2024-06-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2024 5:56:40 PM
Creation date
5/29/2024 5:41:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
6/4/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PLEASE NOTE: <br /> <br /> All forms above must be signed by a representative of the Firm that is legally <br />authorized to contractually bind the Proposer. <br /> <br /> City will not waive notarization requirement when applicable on any of the <br />required attachments. <br />VII. REFERENCES <br />Contractor shall provide three (3) references from other similar public agencies for which services <br />similar to those specified in this RFP have been performed, including contact names and <br />telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B – References. The respondent grants permission <br />for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br /> <br />City may disqualify a Proposer if: <br /> References fail to substantiate Proposer’s description of services and <br />deliverables provided; or <br /> <br /> References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing <br />capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or <br /> <br /> City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the <br />Proposer’s responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City <br />working hours. <br /> <br />VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE <br />See Exhibit II – Sample Agreement <br /> <br />IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will <br />evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined <br />directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br /> <br />B. Scoring Criteria: Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following <br />criteria: <br />CATEGORY POINTS <br />Responsiveness to RFP <br /> Proposal’s compliance with the requirements of this RFP. <br /> Scope of Services offered including ability to provide optional services. <br /> The value to any new and/or innovative product or service suggestions or <br />other new ideas and enhancements. <br /> <br />15 <br />Experience of Firm and Personnel <br /> The experience, resources, and qualifications of the firm and individuals <br />assigned to this account, including manager, supervisor and assigned <br />staff. <br /> <br />50 <br />City of Santa Ana RFP 24-051 Page 8 of 31 <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 30 – 11 6/4/2024
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.