My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2024-06-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
06/04/2024
>
Agenda Packet_2024-06-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2024 5:56:40 PM
Creation date
5/29/2024 5:41:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
6/4/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Government Consulting Partners City of Santa Ana PW Proposal 16 <br />We can use actual time records in place of time estimates if a city employs a time-tracking system. <br />We first review the data to determine if it is reliable enough for fee calculation purposes. We have <br />found that time-tracked data often includes anomalous results caused by human error. If we can <br />extract these anomalous results, this provides an excellent base for cost calculations. If the data is <br />deemed insufficient in accordance with State guidelines, it still may be useful to spot check staff <br />time estimates on a case-by-case basis, providing a higher comfort level for the city’s decision <br />makers. <br /> <br />Case-study analysis method – some user fees aren’t easily analyzed via the per-unit analysis method <br />described above. For example, Santa Ana currently charges a fee of $1.75 per square foot for <br />Sidewalk Inspections. However, your staff likely don’t know how much time it takes to inspect only <br />one square foot of newly constructed or repaired sidewalk. To overcome this, we work with your <br />staff to identify: a) the typical project type/square footage for your city and 2) the reasonable time <br />required to inspect a sidewalk project of this scope and size. Together, we can assess whether the <br />current fee of $1.75 is too high or too low and the proper adjustment required to achieve full cost <br />recovery. The results can then be extrapolated if decision-makers determine that a tiered structure <br />is preferable due to economies of scale. <br /> <br />Programmatic analysis method – some fee services do not lend themselves to either a per-unit or <br />case-study method of analysis. An example includes a daily swim fee within a recreation <br />department. Staff cannot tell us how much time they spend on one swimmer. Another example <br />includes a general plan maintenance fee. Staff cannot quantify how their General Plan and related <br />elements benefits specific proposed developments. For the latter fee, we calculate annual long- <br />range program costs by amortizing staff and consultant fees associated with each element. Next <br />we divide these total program costs by the annual fee revenue the surcharge will be applied <br />against to calculate the appropriate surcharge amount. <br /> <br />Share cost analysis with department contacts – Provide project status reports. <br /> <br />1) Incorporate new data received and email second draft results with backup calculations <br />to each division/fee-area lead. Significant gaps between service costs and the fee <br />currently charged are highlighted. <br /> <br />2) Review the second draft results with each division/fee-area lead. Incorporate in real- <br />time any time adjustments received during the meeting. <br /> <br />3) Establish a firm window for any additional time revisions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 30 – 50 6/4/2024
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.