My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 30 - Agreement for Public Works Cost Recovery Analysis Services
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
06/04/2024
>
Item 30 - Agreement for Public Works Cost Recovery Analysis Services
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2024 4:10:27 PM
Creation date
5/29/2024 6:08:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
30
Date
6/4/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-These are our targets, and the hurdles we need to jump to hit these targets are clear. Our <br />team is confident and ready to go. The remaining sections of our proposal will examine in <br />detail options, ideas, processes, and experiences we have developed over our careers. We are <br />looking forward to combining these experiences with the ideas and experiences of city staff <br />and managers as we explore the best practices found across the country. <br />Services Provided <br />overnment Consulting Partners (GCP ) is a firm focused on the analysis of the full cost of <br />governmental services. This includes the development of federal 2CFR 200 and full cost <br />allocation plans, indirect cost rates, the full cost of providing user fee and SB 90 claiming <br />services and other related cost and revenue enhancement consulting services. The city's RFP <br />requested the following services: <br />Data collection, review of current fees, structure, and cost analysis. <br />Our GCP team has years of experience working in the city. We wantto capitalize on this <br />experience, while also, listening to staff and <br />understanding their goals and objective forthe <br />project. This experience gives us a head start in <br />every aspect of what is outlined in the RFPs <br />scope of services. However, as we think FAII . <br />about the first few weeks of this study, we Co <br />know we will quickly realize we don't know <br />everything. We will approach the kickoff ¢' u N "? C J <br />V 2 Y ,' <br />meeting and the interactions of our team "";''"' `£"� '� _ <br />with city staff with this in mind. Using this � r- — re <br />ra hic as an example, we want to listen { <br />p¢Qpucv <br />first, act second. While our GCP team �6YO:�o W <br />certainly has preconceived ideas and <br />plans, we will not discount the input and <br />direction from the city team who have years of <br />� t <br />actual real -life experiences with the services the <br />study is focused upon. We will take notes, share <br />ideas, then put all the ideas together and finalize a <br />plan of attack. <br />In parallel with these beginning meetings, in <br />the background, our team members will hit <br />the ground running and waste no time <br />learning or asking about what basic data is <br />needed and how to get it. We understand exactly <br />Government Consulting Partners f j , City of Santa Ana PW Proposal 6 <br />1111^1111 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.