My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
06/04/2024
>
Item 32 - Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2024 10:37:15 AM
Creation date
5/29/2024 6:11:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
32
Date
6/4/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.1 Overview <br />This chapter focuses on the key outcomes of the Plan: the recommen- <br />dations and initial project implementation to support Santa Ana Vision <br />Zero. Section 6.2 presents an overview of the project prioritization <br />process and shares a list of the ranked projects. Section 6.3 shares <br />a field review summary from site visits at each location. Section 6.4 <br />includes the specific corridor designs and corresponding cut sheets <br />that show initial project recommendations and what measures should <br />be implemented at each location. A key concept of Vision Zero is that <br />countermeasures shouldn'tjust be implemented at key locations where <br />collisions have already occurred. Rather, they should be proactively im- <br />plemented at locations where collisions are likely going to occur, es- <br />pecially high -severity collisions. The call outs on the aerial photos are <br />intended to be used to pursue grant funding for implementation. Some <br />cut sheets take projects further with preliminary engineering drawings. <br />6.2 Project Prioritization <br />Developing the project prioritization criteria was a combined data -driv- <br />en and interactive process consisting of cumulative scores derived <br />from the various criteria, shown in Table 6-1. The project list with as- <br />signed scores is shown in Tables 6-2 and 6-3. The prioritization pro- <br />cess was developed in collaboration with focused partners, with equity <br />for all users and transportation modes in mind. See Chapter 4 for the <br />list of public, private, and local advocacy partners who helped develop <br />this criteria with objective and equity -based data. The equity impact <br />assessments of the proposed projects and strategies, as well as the <br />population demographics, were a key concern during the analysis and <br />project recommendation process. Ultimately, the projects recommend- <br />ed are all in the underrepresented and underserved areas of Santa <br />Ana and the policies and strategies recommended, focused on ad- <br />dressing equity concerns. Figure 6-1 maps the top twenty priority proj- <br />ects as per the prioritization process as well as the project corridors <br />from the 2016 SMSA study. <br />Table 6-1: Project Prioritization Criteria <br />Crit <br />Descripti <br />KSI/mile <br />The KSI/mile Score represents the number of <br />people Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI) per mile. <br />Each fatality and serious injury received one <br />point, no weight was applied. The higher the <br />KSI, the more likely a corridor needs Vision Zero <br />countermeasures implemented. <br />Street Lane <br />The street lane score represents the number <br />Score <br />of lanes on a corridor. Each lane received one <br />point, 6 being the highest. The more lanes a <br />street has, the more dangerous it is for people <br />walking and bicycling. <br />Median Island <br />Median Islands are one of the most effective <br />Score <br />Vision Zero countermeasures. A Corridor that <br />has a median receives a 0, a partial median <br />receives a 4, and no median receives an 8. <br />Equity, Public, <br />This score is compiled of the number of sur- <br />and Professional <br />vey comments, stakeholder input; professional <br />Score <br />judgment from the project team and the City of <br />Santa Ana on the need of a corridor to receive <br />countermeasures, and it includes results from <br />the Equity Analysis. <br />Total Score <br />The Total Score represents the sum of each pri- <br />oritization criteria. The top 5 scores are to be the <br />top five projects, which will go into more detailed <br />conceptual design. <br />90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.