My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NS-2208E
Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
1953 - 1999 (NS-001-NS-2415)
>
1993 (NS-2182 - NS-2211)
>
NS-2208E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:02:53 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:08:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Ordinance
Doc #
NS-2208E
Date
11/15/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No. NS-2208E 358 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />tion of any proceedings taken hereunder. <br /> <br /> (i) A reduction in pay shall be treated as a demotion under <br />this section, unless the reduction in pay is part of a plan of <br />reclassification of positions or of a plan to reduce salaries and <br />wages in connection with a general economy or curtailment program, <br />or is the result of a finding by the appointing authority that the <br />employee's performance does not justify the continuance of a level <br />of pay that is dependent upon meritorious service. A failure to <br />grant an increase in pay at a time when an increase would otherwise <br />have been granted as a part of a plan to increase salaries and <br />wages throughout the city service shall not be treated as a <br />demotion under this section. <br /> <br /> (j) The personnel board may adopt procedural rules to govern <br />the conduct of its hearings. <br /> <br /> SECTION 2: In Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit <br />Authority, 469 U.S. 528, 105 S.Ct. 1005, 83 L.Ed. 2d 1016 (1985), <br />the United States Supreme Court made the Fair Labor Standards Act <br />and its minimum-wage and overtime provisions expressly applicable <br />to state and municipal employees. This decision effectively <br />overruled the Court's earlier decision in National Leaque of cities <br />v. User¥, 426 U.S. 833, 96 S.Ct. 2465, 49 L.Ed.2d 245 (1976). In <br />response, Congress enacted the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of <br />1985, Pub. L. No. 99-150, Stat. 789, to "ease the fiscal transition <br />for state and local governments newly subject to the Act." Among <br />the amendments were provisions that parts of the Fair Labor <br />Standards Act would not apply to state and municipal governments <br />until April 15, 1986. Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1985, <br />Pub. L. No. 99-150, § 2(c) (1), 99 Stat. 787, 788-789. The <br />amendments to Santa Ana Municipal Code § 9-118 made by this <br />ordinance shall be retroactive to April 15, 1986. The Executive <br />Director of the City's Personnel Services Agency is hereby directed <br />to research and review all pertinent City records to determine <br />whether any City employee, otherwise exempt from the Fair Labor <br />Standards Act, has been suspended from employment, at any time <br />subsequent to April 15, 1986 and up to the date of adoption of this <br />Ordinance, for reasonable and sufficient cause, for any period of <br />one week or less. If the Executive Director finds evidence of any <br />such suspension or suspensions, the Executive Director shall cause <br />to be restored to each such affected employee all salary and other <br /> fringe benefits (such as accrued vacation leave, sick leave or <br /> compensatory time) lost b~f that employee for the period of such <br /> suspension. The purpose this amendment to Santa Ana Municipal <br /> Code § 9-118 is to avoid liability, under 29 C.F.R. § 541.118 <br /> (a) (5), for violating the Fair Labor Standards Act. The purpose of <br /> the retroactivity provision of this ordinance, and the direction <br /> given to the Executive Director of the City's Personnel Services <br /> Agency regarding the suspension of any exempt employee for one week <br /> or less, is to fall within the "window of correction" provision <br /> contained in 29 C.F.R. § 541.118(a) (6). <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />© <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.