Laserfiche WebLink
NORTH HARBOR BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN <br /> <br />167 <br /> <br />A 2.S~ C~aracter Zones <br /> <br />An outgrowth of an analysis of the visual issues and <br />the items within the visual categories is a series of <br />zones, each of which has its own particular characterts- <br />tics. The study area has heen divided into eight charac- <br />ter zones, as follows. (See Figure 2.7.) <br /> <br />1. Designed O~ Space: (No significant visual prob- <br />lems, some elements of higher visual quality.) Areas of <br />intentionally undeveloped land including open recre- <br />ational areas and school grounds. These are generally <br />attractive 'green' areas which enhance the study area. <br /> <br />2. Undroeloped/Unused Mhd: (Lack of spatial defini- <br />tion/ appearance issues.) Vacant lots and open land <br />with no designed use and with no or few built forms. <br />The visual quality is uninteresting with no visual focus <br />or emphasis. Visual containment is lost and views are <br />often of the land uses beyond. <br /> <br /> 3. Undevel~:~d Land Uses: (Lack of spacial defini- <br /> tion/ intrusive visual elements). Temporary or mov- <br /> able land uses on open lots generally with few perma- <br /> nent built forms (e.g., vehicle sales lots, mobile homes). <br />. Areas of open character with little visual containment. <br />Boundaries are open or low and generally poor, land- <br />scape is insufficient or non-existent. There is a high <br />level of visual confusion created by flags, signs, parked <br />vehicles and bright colors. <br /> <br />4. Disorganized Single StoryBuilding: (Building <br />Appearance/Intrusive visual elements) Established <br />areas with no distinct land use pattern. Mainly older <br />quality and poorly maintained buildings on small lots. <br />Buildings are generally of a low architectural standard <br />with no particular style, cluttered frontages and many <br />assorted signs. Setbacks are inconsistent and sidewalks <br />are either narrow or absent. Landscaping is insuffident <br />or non-existent. <br /> <br />5. Organized Single Story Buildings: (Lack of spatial <br />definition) More recently established developments <br />typically consisting of retail, commercial and fast food <br />outlets with a high proportion of strip and L-shaped <br />malls. Buildings are generally of an acceptable archi- <br />tectural standard, although individual malls are differ- <br />ent styles and characters. Signs are better organized. <br />Developments are mainly single story with associated <br />parking lots. Space around the buildings is designed <br />for ease of vehicle movement as well as allowing for <br />internal pedestrian movements. Most areas have <br />designed landscapes. <br /> <br />6. Multi-Story Buildings/Architectural Character: (No <br /> <br />significant visual problems/confused zones.) Taller <br />buildings and groups of buildings, typically residential <br />or motels with better than average visual or architec- <br />tural interest. These areas are generally maintained to <br />a reas6nable standard with some associated landscap- <br />ing. <br /> <br />7. Large Buildings~Logy Architectural Q~"~y: (Intrusive <br />visual elements.) Mixed land uses with larger individ- <br />ual buildings on large or roedium sized lots, typically <br />industrial in character. These buildings are generally <br />functional in character with little or no detailing <br />around the buildings. Lots are open and are generally <br />used for storage or vehicle parking. Little or no land- <br />scaping or other vegetation is present. <br /> <br /> 8~ Low Rise Single lot Developments: (Categories <br /> vary.) Single buildings set within individual and gen- <br /> erally landscaped lots; typically residential neighbor- <br /> hoods. Buildings are of mixed quality with irregular <br /> maintenance standards. Most areas are away from the <br /> major circulation routes. <br /> <br /> The character zones as described above are at times <br /> mixed within a relatively small area. This happens <br /> especially where single larger lots or groups of lots are <br /> of significant visual weight and therefore ara catego- <br /> rized separately from surrounding zones. Where visu- <br /> al characters are mixed, they are shown as <br /> 'Multidimensional Zones.' No overriding landscape <br /> and visual character occurs. These are shown on Figure <br /> A.7 and surrounded by a black border. <br /> <br />In other places, single lots or small groups of lots are <br />inconsistent with the overall character zone, and may <br />be more accurately classed within a different category. <br />However, where these are of little visual importance <br />and do not alter the general character of the wider area, <br />the major zone classification only is shown. These <br />notable inconsistencies are marked on (FigureA.7) by <br />an asterisk. <br /> <br />Also shown on (Figure A.7) are open views. These <br />denote distant views with a feeling of openness, and <br />areas where the visual quality or feature is not directly <br />related to the streetscape. Where the adjoining land <br />use character is the main visual definition to space as <br />viewed from streets within the study area, the character <br />of the adjoining area is indicated. <br /> <br />A 2,5.4 Road Edges <br /> <br />The streets that form the core of the area lack strong <br />unifying features. In particular, Harbor Boulevard lacks <br />a consistent landscape theme as exists along other parts <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />