Laserfiche WebLink
257 <br /> <br /> 13. The ordinance also provided that any extension of the surcharge fee beyond <br />the sunset date would require further action by the City Council. <br /> <br /> 14. Continuation of Proactive Rental Enforcement Program is essential to the <br />neighborhoods in Santa Ana to provide assurances that the rental housing will not be <br />allowed to revert to the condition which led to the initial concerns for the implementation of <br />an inspectionprogram in 1992. <br /> <br /> 15. Recurrent poor management by rental owners has become a challenge for the <br />Proactive Rental Enforcement Program inspectors in maintaining improvements gained in <br />the previous areas while conducting inspections in the next neighborhood. <br /> <br /> 16. The 1999 fee study reports that funding the cost of the required staff and <br />operational costs associated with the continuation of the Proactive Rental Enforcement <br />Program would amount to an estimated $608,410. <br /> <br /> 17. The extension of the $17.50 inspection surcharge fee would only amount to <br />$498,750, thereby generating less than the amount necessary to continue funding the cost of <br />the program. <br /> <br /> 18. In an effort to continue monitoring the results of the program, PREP will <br />continue for another four-year period, commencing on January 1, 2000 and will sunset on <br />December 31, 2003, to allow for review of the program. : <br /> <br /> SECTION 2: The City Council has reviewed and considered the information <br />contained in the initial study and the negative declaration prepared with respect to this <br />Ordinance. The City Council has, as a result of its consideration, and the evidence <br />presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the <br />California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, a <br />Negative Declaration adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this <br />Ordinance. On the basis of this review, the City Council finds that there is no evidence <br />from which it can be fairly argued that the project will have a significant adverse effect on <br />the environment. The City Council hereby certifies and approves the negative declaration <br />and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of <br />the County of Orange in the manner required by law. <br /> <br /> SECTION3: Section 21-120r. l(a) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby <br />amended, which amendment only extends the sunset clause currently in said section from <br />1999 to 2003, to read in full as follows: <br /> <br />Ordinance No. NS - ~ <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />