Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines provides the appropriate threshdds for a Lead Agency to <br />determine ~vhether a subsequent EIR is required fo: a minor change or addition to a project for which <br />an approved E[R or Negative Declaration has been prepared. Under that anal~is, no subsequent EIR <br />or Negative Declaratim shall be prepared fcr the project unless the Lead Agency (the City) <br />determines: <br /> <br />X <br /> <br />X <br /> <br />That substantial chants are made to the project that require major revisions of the previous EIR ' <br />due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the <br />severity of previously identified si~ifieant effects. <br /> <br />Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken <br />that will require major revisions to/he previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects cra substantial increase in the severity of previously identified si~mificant <br />effects. <br /> <br />X New information of substantial in'portance, ~vhich was not known and could not have been known <br /> with the exemise cf reasonable diligence at the time the previoui EIR was certified, shc~vs that (a) <br /> the project Mil have one or more significant effects net discussed in the pre',ious EIR, or {b) that <br /> significant effects pre',iously examined will be substantiallymore severe than as shown in the <br /> previous EIR, (c) that mitigation measures er altemati~,~s that are considerably different frcra those <br /> analyzed in the previous EIR would substantiallyreduce one or more significant effects m the <br /> environment but project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altematbe, or (d) <br /> that mitigation measures or alternatives that are cmsiderably different frcrn those analyzed in the <br /> previous EIR would substantiallyreduee one or more significant effects on the environment but <br /> project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altemati'~e. <br /> <br />The folloMng analysis has been prepared in acco-dance Mth the finding required in Section 15162 of <br />the CEQA Guidelines. The anal)sis is presented in the same order of environmental issues evahiated <br />in FE][R 96-01. <br /> <br />Land Use <br /> <br />Potential project-level and cumulative land use impacts asscciated xvith implementation &the DSC <br />project were evaluated in FEIR 96-01. Mitigation measures were included in FEIR 96-01 to reduce <br />potential land use irrpacts to a level considered less than significant. The proposed project, to increase <br />the amount of development area asseciated vdth DSC Phase II, would not change the type of land uses <br />permitted in SD65 or evaluated in FE1R 96-01. Implementation of the proposed project exceeds <br />maximum allowable development area permitted under SD65 but ~muld be offset with the reducticn in <br />the seating of the proposed theater frcrn 350 to 275 seats and would not result in newland use impacts <br />beyond the impacts previously analyzed in FEIR 96-01. The changes to the project would not result in <br />conflicts x~Sth other applicable planningpro~ams in the City of Santa Ann, nor would the proposed <br />request substantiallyincrease the sexer/ty of any land use impact identified in FEIR 96-01. <br /> <br />Ordinance No. NS-2497 <br /> <br />HSROBB FILESX, a. mend I dsc revl.dcc ~{03,'07/02,~ <br /> <br />Pae~5 ofl7 <br /> <br />Page ~7 o~-49 <br /> <br /> <br />