NS-2497 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Noise Potential long-term and short-term noise impacts and cumulative noise impacts asscciated with the implementation of the DSC project were adequatelyevaluated in FEIR 96-01. Mitigation measures were identified in FEll?. 96-0 i to reduce potential noise impacts to a level considered less than si~ificant with the exception of noise from piledrlving for the parking structure (if it is detenfined to be necessary) and noise associated w'ith potential outside activities adjacent to the free~ay. The increased de'~elopment area proposed for DSC Phase ~I would not result in additicnal noise impacts beyond the impacts previously analyzed in FEIR 96-01 and would not substantially increase the severity of any noise impact identified in FEIR 96-0 L Additionally, no new information has been made available since preparation of FEIR 96-01 that would affect the neise analysis and environmental determinations made in FE/R 96-01. Geology/Soils Potential geological and soil impacts asscciated with the implementation of the DSC project were adequately evaluated in FEIR 96-01. Mitigation measures were identified in FEIR 96-01 to reduce potential geological and soil impacts to a level considered less than significant. The projected height' of the building housing the domed theater is 106 feet, ~hile the existingeube structure is 107 feet. The increased de~,elopmebt area proposed for DSC Phase TI would not result in additicnal geologic or soil impacts beyond the impacts previously analyzed in FE[R 96-01 and would not substantially increase the severity of any geologic or soil impacts identified in FEIR 96-01, in that potential geologic constraints associated with the project site are addressed in PER 96-01. Because the site is fiat and a relatively small amount of soil excavation is necessary, implementation of the proposed project would not involve the development of land uses or construction activities that ~muld increase the riskof geologic impacts. Additienally, no new information has been made available since preparatim 0f FEIR 96-0! that would adversely affect the geologic and soil impact analysis, n~tigation measures, and environmental determ/nations made in FEIR 96-01. Itydrology Potential h}drOlogical impacts associated with the implementation of the DSC project were adequately evaluated in FEIR 96-01. Mitigation measures were identified in FEIR 96-01 to reduce potential hydrological impacts to a level considered less than significant. The increased dexelopment area proposed for DSC Phase U would not result in additional hydrological impacts b%und the impacts previously analyeed in FEIR 96-01 and would not substantlallyincrease the sexedty of any h~,~rological impact identified in FEIR 96-01. There are no increases in surface v. ater runoff resulting from the proposed development. All drainage would be accommodated by on-site drainage improvements, as originallyproposed. Additionally; no new infom~ation has been made available since preparatim of FEI:R 96-01 that would adversely affect the h)drologlcal impact analysis, nfitigation measures, and en',ironmental determinations made in FEIR 96-01. Cultural Resources Potential project related and curmlative impacts to cultural rescurces asscciated with the implementation ofthe DSC project were adequatelyevaluated in FEIR 96-01. Mitigation measures were included in F£1R 96-01 to reduce project related in'pacts to cultural resources to a level considered less than si~mificant. The increased development area proposed for DSC Phase TI would Ordinnnn~ Kin H:~P-OBD~ILES~,Amend I dsc rcvl.doc ~03/07/02,~ Page 39 of 49 ' Page~7 ot 17 -