My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1922
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1886-1951
>
1922
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:29:21 PM
Creation date
4/9/2003 2:45:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Pre-Charter
Year
1922
Pre-Charter - Doc Type
Minutes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zn Re <br /> <br />P~solution No. 850 <br /> <br />C2press Ave. Assessments. <br /> <br /> No. 8~5 is a distriot in whioh all.~the property will <br /> be benefitted by the proposed work and inzprovement <br /> and ought to be assessed to pay the oosts and <br /> expenses thereof. <br /> <br /> The oos~r of the proposed work against whioh the <br /> obJeotions and protests are ~ade, is to be assessed <br /> upon a distriot and the obJeotlons .and protests are <br /> not mede by the owners of one-half the area of <br /> the property to be assessed for said improvement, <br /> <br />~ut ia mede only by pep oent of such a~a. <br />* /Whereupon T~uetee ~.R.~le introduoed a ~esolu- <br /> tion ovex~-uling and denying eaalx and.all, p~ot4sts <br /> offered, mede or delivered. The l~o~l was oalled and <br /> the ~esolution passed by the followir~ .vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: Trustees ~.W.Tubba, C.II. Chap~n, I~.I~.~le, <br /> W.A.Greenleaf, ~oh~ G. Mitohell. <br /> <br /> Noes: Trustees None. <br /> Absent: T~stees None~ <br /> I~aoh and all of the obJeetions and protests mede <br /> presented or delivered against the proposed wo~k and <br /> against the extent of the dist~i~t to be assessed <br /> therefor, having been t~a~d, passed upon., ovex~mled <br /> and denied by the Boq~d el' Trustees of the oity of <br /> Santa Ana, said Board of T~uatees deem.that it has <br /> sequined and possesses ~u~isdXotion to order the <br /> p~oposed improvement on a portion of NO~th.Briatol <br /> Street and on South Bristol ~t~et, and no person <br /> appearing to ob Jeer or did object to ~ p~oposed <br /> ohar~e or modifioations of g~ads on .South B~lstol <br /> 6t~eet. <br /> <br /> Thereupon T~ustee ~.W.Tubbs introduoed a reso- <br /> lution ordering the wo~k to be done and improvement <br /> to be mede upon a portion of North B~istol Street <br /> and on South Bristol Street, ~a. iefl2 deeo~i~d in <br /> Resolution of Intention No. ~5. The ~esolution was <br /> ordered filed, read, oonsidered, designated Resolu- <br /> tion ordering wox~ No. ~44~ the roll was ~alled and <br /> the resolution passed ~ the vote of the foll=wir~ <br /> named memO,s of the Board of T~ustees: <br /> <br /> Ayes: T~uatees ~.W.Tubbe, ¢.H. Chap~n, ~.~.~le, <br /> W.A.Greenleaf, ~ohn O. Mitchell. <br /> <br /> Noes: ~h-ustees None. <br /> <br /> Absent: Trustees None. <br /> <br /> Trustee C.H. Ohapmen introdused a ~solution entitled <br /> as follows: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.