1923 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In Re Resolution No. 02~ Orderln~ Plans & ~pe¢. E. Santa Clara & Snurgeon. In Re Resolution of Intention 929. N. McCray Street In Re Resolution Overruling protests No. 930. Bush St., E.& W. 20th, East Santa Clara Ave. Trustee J. ~. Tubbs introduced a resolution requiring ?!ars and sreclflcations and careful estlmat,'s of cost f~,r the w~.rk to be done and Im~rov~Lent to be made on ¥~ortious of those o~en puLlic streets Santa Aha commonly known as Fast Lanta C]ar~ Avenue and ~rur~e on Street. The resolut~ on d~s{~nated R~solution No. 928 and rassed by the follow- vote Ayes: Trustees '.-.Tub~s, C .... Chapman, Green~eaf, John ~-. Y. itchell. Absent: Trustee C. it to be the clt~ on a Trust~es None. Trustees None. Chapman introduced a resolution declaring intention of the Board of Trustees of the of Santa Aha to order work done and Improvement portion of North ~nClay Street, an open public street in said clty~ the resolution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution of ~ntentlon N~. 929; the roll was called and ~h~ resolutlon passed by the following vote: Ayes: Trustees J.~.Tubbs, C.H. Chapman, H.H.Dale, ~.A.Greenleaf, John G. ~Itchell. Noes: Trustees None. Absent: Trustees No~e. This being the day, hour and place fixed in Resolution of Intention No. 914 for t}~e improvement of a ~,ort[on of =ush Street, West Twentieth St., East ~ventleth St., and East S~ta Clara Avenue, for the hearing of protests and objections, and the Board of Trustees having met and being now in session, proceeded to hear any protests or objections offered agalust the proposed work, or against thc extent of the district to be assessed, or objections to the proposed change or modification of grade on a part of Bush Street and on West Twentieth Street. Southern ~aclfic Railroad Co. and Southern Pacific Co having filed protests against the proposed work and ex- tent of the district, the Board of Trust~es heard and passed upon sa~d protests. The proposed work and the cost thereof is to be assessed u~on the property w~thin the district, and the city council finds that such pro- tests are made by the owners of less than one-half of. th~ area of the property to be assessed for the improvement and that the same ought to be overruled and denied. Thereupon, Trustee ~..n. Green]eaf introduced a resolu-