My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1923
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1886-1951
>
1923
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:29:28 PM
Creation date
4/9/2003 3:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Pre-Charter
Year
1923
Pre-Charter - Doc Type
Minutes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In Re <br /> <br />~ast Myrtle Street. <br /> <br />Adopting Plans & Spec. <br /> <br />Resolution 988 <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />Resolution ~o. <br /> <br />Ordering Work <br /> <br />~outh Garnsey <br /> <br />West Myrtle. <br /> <br />~.ent!oned proceedings of annexation Clyde Bishop is <br />not to be held responsible therefor. <br /> <br />Trustee .C.H. Chapman introduced a res~lut~ on adopting <br />the plats and sp,-c~ficstions furnished by the city <br />engineer for the work to be done a~d improvement to <br />be made upon a portion of East ~-yrtle Xtree~. ~e <br />resolution was ordered fi]ed, read, considered, <br />designated Resolution No. 936, the roll was called <br />ard tbs resolution rassed by the following vote: <br /> <br /> D~yes: Trustees J.?.'.Tubbs, C.L~.Chapman, <br /> <br /> Dale, 'J.'.A.Oreen]eaf, John. O.L'itche~l. <br /> i~oes: Trustees None. <br /> Absent: Trustees ?,~on e. <br /> <br />This being ~he day, hour a~d p]ace fixed in <br />E~solution of Intention L'o. 917 for the improvement <br />of a portion of South Garnsey Street and West <br />L:yrtle Street, for the hearing of protests ard <br />objections, sod the Board of Trustees having duly, <br />met andbe~mg now in session, proceeded to hear any <br />protests or objections offered. L'o owner of <br />property liable to be assegsed f6r said work made <br />written cr any pretests against the proposed work <br />or ag~.inst the extent of t]~ district, and no pers~ <br />appearing to protest or did protest or to object or <br />did object to proposed change or modification of <br />th~ grade on parts of said streets, the Board of <br />Trustees deem that they hsd acquired jurisdiction <br />to order the proposed improvement. <br /> <br /> ~ereupon, Trustee H.H.Dale introduced a reso- <br />lution ordering the work; the resolution was <br />ordered f~_ed, read and considered; designated <br />R~solution Ordering Work No. 987. The roll was <br />called ~_~d tl~e resolution teased,by the votes of <br />the follo~ving named members of tls Board of <br /> <br />Trustees: <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> <br />Trustees J.~';.T~b~s, C.}'.ChsDman, V.N. Dale, <br /> <br />7;.A.C~reenleaf, John a. }.~itchetl. <br /> <br />Trustees Nou~. <br /> <br />Trustees Non~. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.