Laserfiche WebLink
In Re <br /> <br />Resolution of Award <br /> <br />~o. l~Oq - Lacy St. <br /> <br />Hesolutlon No. 1:208 <br /> <br />Determining Unp~ Id <br /> <br />As sea s~.~ents Br'~to] <br /> <br />bt. <br /> <br />designated Resolution of <br />b5 the following' vote: <br /> <br />Intention No. 12D6 ar~d p~sed <br /> <br />Trustees ~.L.Chapmea, ~;~x~x~k~;~ <br />E.B.Collier, Nat Y. Neff, J. L'. Tubbs. <br /> <br />Noes: Trustees Ge~.McPhee. <br /> <br />Abse~t: Trustees llano. <br /> <br />T].'s being the ti~e nn~ place limed for the opening of <br />~ds or pro~,osals for the work ordered done ~ nd i~rrove- <br />mart altered made upon and alon~ ~ portion of L,c~ St. <br /> <br />briefly desc~"ibed in Resolution of Intention ~o. 1180, <br />and the Board of Tr'~ztees be~n; now in session proceede <br />~ ~id publicly open, examine ~nd declare all bids <br />~ece~ved. Bids were received as fo!lows: <br /> <br />Item 1. %~e regrsd~ng to ~ ~b-grade and the laying <br /> of six inch concrete pavement ~th belt <br /> finish wearing surface, complete with tt~e <br /> furnish!~ of al 1 necessary equipmemt sad <br /> material on sn estimate of 25031 square feet. <br /> <br />0glesby & Dahl Item 1. - 28~ ~ <br />Le]ls f 5r~asler 24~ ~ <br />~. R. Ford 23~ ~ <br /> <br /> TLe Bosrd cf Trustee~ ~hereupon rejected sl] bids <br />~xcep~ ~]-e b'd herelnaf~er ~en~ioned sad awarded lh~ <br />c~ntrsc~ ~o B. K. Ford f~r the ~rk or Im~rovewe~ s~ ti <br /> <br />lowest responsible bidder ~herefor, s~ ~be price na~e~ <br /> t~ bid. <br /> <br /> T~ee Ycrhee ~ben introduced a re~oln~Ion sward~rg <br />t]e cor, trnc' to B. R. Ford. The ~soluti~n wes order~,d <br />f~]ed, read, coos!dared, desi Fas, ted Resolution of Award <br /> <br />No. 120V and passed by the ~ollowing vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: Trustees C.Y.Chapman, Geo. YcFhee, E.P.Col]ie <br /> Nat }~. Neff, J. . T,bbs. <br /> <br /> Noes: Tr ust~es I~one. <br /> <br /> Absent: Trustees None. <br /> <br />~'.~ he~ng the t~me and ~lace fixed <br />persona migkt ~prear ~nd s}'ow c~uae <br />be ~asued upon the s ecur~ty of the unpaid <br /> <br />Eorttn and South Eristol St. ns set out in <br /> <br />why said bonds skou]d not be issued, Trustee Collier <br />~ntroduced n reso]utlon determining unpaid assessments <br />for the w'~rk dooe ~od ~mDrovemeot m~de u~on N~th ~nd <br />Louth Pr!stol St., nnd the n=~re~ste thereof, directing <br />bonds to be Issued upon the see~ity of t~e unpaid <br />assessments, pregcr~bfng the denomin~tions of s~Id bonds <br />and provtRtng for tke ism ance of s,me In annual series. <br /> <br /> ~he resolution w~s ordered f~led, read, considered, <br /> <br />%~] en interested <br /> <br />why bonds should not <br /> assessments <br /> port,on of <br /> Resolution of <br /> <br /> <br />