1928 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In Re Application Al. Adrian Service Station. In Re Opening N. Sycamore St. In Re Reso. No. 2002 Ordering Work Ross Street. 321 On motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by Kelly and car- ried, the recommendation of the Planning Commission was accepted and the application of Al. Adrian to locate a service station on the southwest corner of Fifth and Flower Streets was granted. Upon motion of Trustee Chancy, seconded by McBride and carried, the City Attorney was instructed to sign appli- cations in the case of the City of Santa Aha vs. Louis Ewing, et al, being for the opening of North Sycamore Street, with certain defendants stipulating that Judg- ment might be entered against the City of Santa Aha as to Parcel No. 10, described in the complaint, and known as the Shields property, for the sum of $5B0.00; and that Judgment might be entered against the City of Santa Ana as to Parcel No. 4, described in the complaint, and known as the Clark property, for the sum of $480.00; and that Judgment might be entered against the City of Santa Aha as to Parcel No. 9, described in the complaint; and known as the Fluor property for the sum of $400.00; and that Judgment might be entered against the City of Santa Ana as to Parcel No. 8, described in the complaint, and known as the Fluor property, for the sum of $1100.00; and th-t Judgment might be entered against the City of Santa Ana as to Parcel No. 24, described in the and known as the Smiley property, for the sum of that said motion was carried by the following stated vote Ayes, Trustees J.L. McBride, W.J. Kelly, Homer C. Chancy, Stanley E. Good,. Noes, Trustees None. Absent, Trustees F.L. Purinton. This being the time and place set forth in Resolution of Intention No. 1991 to order ~he work done and made upon and along Ross Street and Sixteenth Street, the C~ty Council being duly convened in open session, proceeded to hear and pass upon all protests presented. No owner of property liable to be assessed for said work made written protest or any pretest against the proposed work or against the extent of the district to be therefor and no person appearing to protest or object or show any cause why the improvement should not be carried out in accordance with Resolution of Intention No-. 19~1, the City Council deemed that it had acquired Jurisdicti, to order the proposed improvement. A resolution was introduced ordering the work to be done and improvement made as briefly set out in ResolUtion of Intention No. 19~1. The resolution was ordered.filed, read,