1931 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In Re Contract fo~ Gasoline. ~n Re Agreemen~ with Oeneral Petroleum COrpo In Re Agreement O. C. Griffith. I~Re Assembly Bill #486. In Re Suit for Delinquent Taxes. In Re Reso. No. 2~01 Dst. Unpaid Assess. ie~thFlower Street. 349 ~ motion of Trustee Warner, seconded by McBride and oar' tied, the bid of the Union Oil Company for city gasoline at .10~ per-gallon for the coming ~a~ starting ~uly 1st, 1931, was.accepted and the Clerk instructed to re- tumn the checks of ~he unsuccessful bidders. On motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by HasenJaeger and carried~ the Mayor and Clerk were instructed to sign agreement with the ~eneral Petroleum Corporation of California covering the o~nstructiom of an electric sign at ~he northeast corner of Seventeenth and Broadway ex- tending over the fifteen foot set-back line established along-North Broadway. On motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by Witmer and oar- tied, the Mayor and Clerk were instm~oted to sign an a~reement wi~h G. C. Oriffith covering the construction of an electric sign at the southwest corner of First and Sycamore Streets, extending over the five foot set-back line established by ordinance on West First Street. On motion of T~ustee Warner, seoonded by McBride and oar- tied, the City Attorney was instructed to notify Senator N. T. EdWsmds and Assemblyman Edwamd Craig that the City of Santa Aha opposes Assembly Bill No. 486 pertaining to the levy-of license tax against wholesalers delivering merchandise to retailers in municipalities. O~motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by Wa~ner and car- ried, the City Attorney was &utlu)~ized to p~ooeed with suit against the County of Orange to obtain moneys cover- in6 delinquent taxes. ~nia b~ng the time and place when and where interested persons might appear and show cause why bonds should not bo issued upon the secumity of the unpaid assessments f~ work done and improvement w~4e upon portion of North Flower Street between Santa Clara Avenue and North Park Boulevard, in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 226~ and the City Council being now in session, proceede~ to hear all protests presented. No person appearing to protest o~ show any cause why bonds should not be issued a resolution was introduced detex'minin6 the unpaid assessments for work and improve- ment made upon said streets, the aggregate thereof~ directing bonds to be issued for the security of the