My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
59-060
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1959
>
59-060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2014 12:43:21 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:27:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
59-60
Date
3/16/1959
Document Relationships
58-243
(Amends)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1958
58-260
(Amends)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1958
58-296
(Amends)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1958
59-014
(Amends)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1959
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
additional protests representing a value of $137,850.00 were received <br />and filed; that upon examination of said protests and said protest <br />withdrawals, it was determined that protests representing assessed <br />value in amount of $316,690.00 had been filed; that the assessed value <br />of the territory was $1,969,290.00, and it was determined and declared <br />that the protests represented 16% of the assessed value of the terri- <br />tory, and that the owners of one-half of the value of the territory <br />had not protested against said election, and <br /> <br /> ~EREAS, the City Council thereupon found and declared that <br />protests against the annexation of that certain territory theretofore <br />designated as "~est Santa Ana Annex", and against the holding of an <br />election in said territory on the question of annexation, had not been <br />made by the owners of one-half of the value of said territory, as <br />shown on the last equalized assessment roll of 0r~ge County, Cali- <br />fornia; that such protests represented but 16% of said value, and <br />declared that it had come to the attention of the City of S~ta Aha <br />that said "West Santa Ana Annex" had inadvertently overlapped or in- <br />cluded a small portion of Garden Grove Annexation No. 63, and that <br />said overlapped or included area should fo rth~th be excluded from <br />the "West Santa Ana Annex" by a change of the boundaries of said annex <br />as permitted by Government Code Section 35121.5, and instructed the <br />City Attorney to immediately resubmit a new description of the bound- <br />aries, together with an accompanying map to make such change in the <br />boundary as is necessary to exclude said ove~apped or included portion <br />of Garden Grove Annexation No. 63, the same being materially less <br />than 5% of the entire area of said Santa Ana annexation; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Resolution title hereinabove quoted in full in the <br />title of this Resolution was presented to the Council in written form <br />and was passed and adopted by said Council by the unanimous vote of <br />all Councilmen present, Councilman Royal B. Hubbard then being absent, <br />and the Santa Ana City Attorney was instructed, if said new descrip- <br />tion of boundaries be approved as to definiteness and certainty, <br />thereafter to use said new description boundaries in all matters <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.