Laserfiche WebLink
EEBOLUTION NO. 59-228 OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALI- <br />FORNIA EXPRESSING-----0P---~SITION TO ELIMINATION OF AREA~ <br />WITHIN CITIES FROM THE ~INTERBTATE HIGHWAY <br /> <br /> ww~.W~EAS, an I~$erstate Highway System of importance to all <br /> <br />of the peoples and states of the Nation has been determined to be <br />in the Federal interest, to permit the free interchange of vehicu- <br />lar traffic and the flow of military vehicles in time of national <br />need, and is now proposed to be constructed in part with Federal <br />funds; and <br /> <br /> W}l~, there is presently an attempt to treat said program as <br />a rumal aid program only, and to prohibit the expenditure of Federal <br />funds within City limits; <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED: By the City Council of the <br />City of Santa Aha that they hereby express their unalterable and <br />unqualified opposition to the elimination of territory within cities <br />from any Federal ~ystem Interstate Highways for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1. The source of a very large percent of all Federal tax <br />dollars to be used in such a system would be derived from City areas. <br /> <br /> 2. The greatest need for unconstricted and "flow-through" <br />highways exists in metrmpolitan areas where overloaded and inade- <br />quate streets in many cases bring a halt to or seriously delay <br />through-traffic. <br /> <br /> 3. The bulk of traffic will originate in City ameas, terminate <br />in City areas, and flow through City areas. <br /> <br /> 4- Unless the Federal-aid Interstate Highway System is con- <br />tinued through cities the system will be incomplete, bottlenecked, <br />and serve but a small fraction of the purposes for which it was con- <br />ceived, for the reason that many cities will be unable or unwilling <br />to continue such highways through such cities at their own total ex- <br />pense, or will be in disagreement with the expressed purpose or need <br />for such a system, resulting in a partial defeat of the pumpose of <br />such a system. <br /> <br /> 5. It would be inequitable to prohibit the use of Federal funds <br /> raised largely in cities within the exterior boundaries of those same <br /> cities. <br /> <br /> <br />