My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Adopt a Resolution and Approve Agreement for Tax Revenue Auditing, Analysis, Forecasting, and Reporting Service
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
07/16/2024
>
Item 23 - Adopt a Resolution and Approve Agreement for Tax Revenue Auditing, Analysis, Forecasting, and Reporting Service
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2024 5:22:02 PM
Creation date
7/10/2024 10:30:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Finance & Management Services
Item #
23
Date
7/16/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tax Revenue Auditing, Analysis, Forecasting, and Reporting Services <br />July 16, 2024 <br />Page 2 <br />welcome to submit bids for all or only some of the options listed. The eight options were <br />as follows: <br />• Option A: Sales & Use Tax (Bradley -Burns Allocation) and Transactions & Use <br />Tax (Santa Ana Measure X) <br />• Option B: Property Tax, Property Tax In -Lieu of Vehicle License Fees, Residual <br />Allocations from the Redevelopment Property Tax Transfer Fund, and <br />Documentary Stamp Tax: $88.39M, 22.05% of GF Total Revenue <br />• Option C: Non -Regulatory Business License Tax <br />• Option D: Business License Tax for Cannabis Business <br />• Option E: Hotel Visitors Tax <br />• Option F: Utility Users Tax for Electric, Gas & Telecommunications Services <br />• Option G: Statistical Report Package for the Annual Comprehensive Financial <br />Report <br />Three proposals were received and were subsequently reviewed by a four -member <br />committee composed of staff from the Finance and Management Services Agency and <br />the Community Development Agency. <br />Each of the responding consultants were interviewed and evaluated based on the <br />following criteria: <br />• Qualifications <br />• Experience <br />• Proposed work plan for the requested scope of services <br />• Client references <br />• Cost of providing services <br />The proposals were ranked accordingly as follows: <br />Rank <br />Firm <br />Options bid <br />1 <br />HdL Coren & Cone <br />B, G <br />2 <br />Hinderliter, de Llamas and Associates <br />A, C, D, E, F <br />3 <br />MuniServices LLC <br />A, C, D, E, F, G <br />The proposals submitted by Hinderliter, de Llamas and Associates ("HdL") and HdL <br />Coren & Cone ("HdLCC") for the options bid upon were found to be the most responsive <br />to the City's needs, offer the best value, and are appropriate for the services requested. <br />HdL and HdLCC both possess strong qualifications, experience, and client references <br />as well as appropriate proposed work plans that will provide for a flexible and cost- <br />effective auditing program. Both consultants also possess extensive experience in <br />implementing identical services for comparable and neighboring cities, including the <br />Cities of Long Beach, Corona, Costa Mesa, Irvine, Newport Beach, Ontario, Riverside, <br />and Torrance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.