Laserfiche WebLink
City of • • Ana <br /> Subconsultants <br /> Willdan provides full service, in-house professional engineering plan checks, consulting, and design <br /> services for many varied developmental and capital improvement projects, including residential and <br /> commercial developments, roadway, grading, drainage, water, sewer, major highway facilities, bridge <br /> structures, traffic signals, and signing and striping improvements. As such, we can perform the plan <br /> check services requested by the City without the involvement of team sub-consultants. <br /> Understanding of Need &Work Approach <br /> Willdan is noted for open lines of communication and flexibility in providing plan review services. We <br /> can provide reviews of hard copy or electronic documents. Coordination of all plan reviews will be <br /> through Mr. Stein. We understand that site visits may be required to the project locations and when so <br /> conducted, photographs will be taken and documented in the project file. It is expected that plan checks <br /> should not exceed four (4) total plan checks which includes three (3) plan reviews and one (1) final <br /> mylar review for approval if required by the City. Willdan's approach to the plan review process is shown <br /> in the flow chart and as follows: <br /> Plan Review Process <br /> © City notifies © © Onitial review of <br /> Willdan and Documents Documents documents to <br /> uploads plan received and distributed to observe <br /> review logged in discipline leaders completeness/ <br /> assignment critical errors <br /> •Submittal <br /> complete <br /> •No critical <br /> errors <br /> •Continue City directs <br /> with review Willdan to mh O Q Q �}'► <br /> Notify City& continue CY <br /> withthe Willdan Lelecdt'-nlcally <br /> illdan <br /> Developer Willdan Willdan returns Wulldan <br /> completes vi. eand coordinate review. performs the comment matrix reviewed plan reviews to Supports City <br /> with them to — plan review the City QA/QC <br /> •Submittaldetermine if and notifies City uments <br /> incomplete review should <br /> or with continue City directs ' <br /> critical errors <br /> •Notify City Willdan to <br /> suspend the <br /> review. <br /> Process Items 1 through 3: Once Willdan is notified of Process Item 6: Saving review time allows for saving <br /> a plan review assignment, it is logged into the tracking time for the developer, which is essential to a project <br /> system and distributed to discipline leaders. schedule. Once a plan check is complete and ready for <br /> Process Item 4 through 5b: Our professionals perform further review, the reviewers electronically review the <br /> a preliminary review of the plans to obtain an documents electronically and provide comments in an <br /> understanding of the site and improvements, as well as electronic format acceptable to the City. <br /> to identify any substantial errors or omissions such as Process Item 7-9: At the completion of the plan review, <br /> obvious utility conflicts. These can become critical issues a comment matrix will be created to summarize <br /> that necessitate substantial redesign. If critical issues comments from all disciplines reviewed. Documents will <br /> are identified, they will be brought to the City's attention be entered into the tracking system and the City will be <br /> to determine whether the review should continue or be notified. <br /> suspended pending the required redesign. Process Item 10: Willdan will be available to support the <br /> City on any inquiries during QA/QC period as required. <br /> ervices 9 <br /> City Council 15 —25 Proposal orn- a � 7 <br />