Laserfiche WebLink
As part of the application process, residents, business owners, and <br />property owners within 1,000 feet of the Target were sent letters <br />notifying them of Target's application request for the sale of distilled <br />spirits, in addition to beer and wine, for off -premises consumption. <br />Target and staff both contacted the representatives of the <br />Washington Square, Artesia Pilar, West Floral Park, and Riverview <br />neighborhood associations to identify any areas of concerns due to <br />the proposed application request and no objections were received. <br />Target will continue to seek community input and coordinate with the <br />community to first identify and then resolve any issues should they <br />arise. <br />Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br />and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is categorically exempt from further review <br />pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Class <br />1 exemption applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, <br />or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical <br />equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or <br />former use as determined by the lead agency. The project proposes to modify an existing <br />CUP to allow the sale of distilled spirits, in addition to beer and wine, for off -premises <br />consumption at an existing Target store. As such, a new Notice of Exemption (NOE) will <br />be filed for this project. <br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized <br />volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, <br />lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal, <br />equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute <br />resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such <br />other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought <br />against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set <br />aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or <br />any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and <br />instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or <br />concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, <br />California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map <br />Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local <br />constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of <br />competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve <br />the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City <br />for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of <br />the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall <br />cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. <br />Resolution No. 2024-XXX <br />Page 6of8 <br />