My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 11 - Orange County Grand Jury Report: Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
08/20/2024
>
Item 11 - Orange County Grand Jury Report: Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2024 3:44:23 PM
Creation date
8/14/2024 10:23:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
11
Date
8/20/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste <br />Another standardization issue is that what is accepted for recycling varies among the <br />jurisdictions and haulers. <br />For example, some allow palm fronds into organics bins while others do not, and some <br />allow food scraps to be deposited in compostable bags while others do not, further <br />adding to the confusion. <br />• Funding and Enforcement <br />While conducting interviews with the Orange County jurisdictions, the OCGJ learned <br />that there are two approaches to funding their solid waste management programs <br />(including SB 1383 implementation activities): (1) using an enterprise fund; and (2) <br />using the general fund. Using an enterprise fund ensures that all revenues generated by <br />the solid waste management program are reinvested in that program rather than being <br />diverted into other needs of the jurisdiction. <br />Even though enforcement activities were effective starting January 1, 2024, jurisdictions <br />only conduct inspections and spot-checks of residential customers' organic and trash <br />containers using either "lid flipping" or smart trucks that record the contents of the <br />containers as they are being emptied. Haulers (via contracts) have been designated to <br />perform these functions. If residents are found to be in violation, the first step is to <br />provide them with additional educational materials and information. If the violation <br />persists, warning notices are issued. The final step is issuing fines. The penalties <br />imposed by a jurisdiction are based on Government Code Sections 53069.4, 25132, <br />and 36900, and are as follows: <br />First violation: $50-$100 per violation; <br />Second violation: $100-$200 per violation; <br />Third or subsequent violation: $250-$500 per violation <br />Penalties increase when an entity violates the same requirement within a one-year <br />period (CalRecycle, 2024). <br />While jurisdictions have yet to collect fines, some have not even established the <br />collection protocol or the account where collected fines will be deposited. <br />• Education and Outreach <br />Clearly, there is a need for more education and outreach. The success of SB 1383 <br />implementation and the ability to reach the CalRecycle goal of a seventy-five percent <br />diversion rate depend largely on residents' compliance and behavior change. Education <br />and outreach is the first and most critical component of that change. <br />"The accuracy of consumer disposal decisions directly influences the <br />performance of the recycling system." (Christian Blanco C. S., 2023) <br />2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.