Laserfiche WebLink
311 <br /> <br /> Government Code, Section 37100 provides that the Council may pass ordinances not in conflict with <br /> the Constitution and laws of the State or the United States. Therefore, the right of the people <br /> of the City of Santa Ara to adopt ordinances by the initiative process is limited to the adoption <br /> of ordinances not in conflict with the Constitution and the laws of the State or the United States, <br /> As I told you, I am informed and believe that the City will be involved in litigation regarding <br /> the above initiative regardless of what the City does in this matter. In all probability, the <br /> next 0ity election will be held on April 7, 1953. In fairness to the proponents of this proposed <br /> initiative measure, I believe an approach which will allow all questions regarding the legality to <br /> be raised in one action should be followed. The time is short and I doubt if-two separate <br /> actions, even at the Superior Court level, could be completed in time to allow this measure ~to be <br /> placed on the ballot if the Court finally held that it should be. No California Court has ever <br /> passed on Section 1705 of the Election Code. A decision on this Section would be of service to <br /> all cities of the State. <br />In my opinion the main interest of the Council at this time should be to avoid multiplicity of <br />actions. X have always believed that one of the preliminary duties of a City Council was to <br />avoid the neSdless or wasteful expenditure of tax money. You should also consider your duty <br />in this regard and seek to adopt a position which will require the expenditure of the fewest tax <br />dollars. I point this out especially because I do not believe that the adoption of the proposed <br />initiative ordinance would change or correct or benefit or harm anything or interest in the City. <br />That is, I do not believe it is legislative in nature. The Council as such can have no interest <br />in the adoption of or defeat of this proposed initiative ordinance. Therefore, you~ duty to <br />avoid unnecessary expenditure of tax funds would seem to be a clear obligation upon your Honorable <br />Body. The only other obligation is to afford the proponents of this measure an opportunity fop an <br />early amd complete Court determination." <br /> <br />In Re <br />Application <br />to solicit <br />funds <br /> <br />.On recommendation of the appointed committee and on motion of Trustee <br />Dahl, seconded by Hunter and carried, the request of B.F.Harbury, <br />Principal, Stony Crest School, at Petrie, for permission to solicit <br /> <br />funds in the sum of $150.00 for the purpose of obtaining funds to <br /> <br />build a school unit and remodel an existing building for dormity use, <br /> <br />In Re <br />Ordinance <br />Anti-Noise <br />Regulations <br /> <br />was denied. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee Hunter, seconded by Dahl and carried, the <br />lng Ordinance entitled: <br /> <br /> "An Ordinance amending ~Banta Ara Hunicipal <br /> CodeI by amending Sections 4270 and ~270.1 <br /> and repealing <br /> <br />declaring necessity to prohibit noises, was introduced, read, con- <br /> <br />lin Re <br />Advertise for <br />bids - Fire Hose <br /> <br />sidered and placed on file for second reading. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee Jerome, seconded by Dahl and carried, the Clerk <br /> <br />was authorized to advertise for bide for 1200 ft. of 1~" double <br /> <br />.Jacketed cotton rubber lined fire hose with brass rocker lug coupling~ <br /> <br />coupled in 50 ft. lengths with Pacific Coast standard thread. <br /> <br />1000 ft. of 2~" double Jacketed cotton rubber lined fire hose with <br /> <br />brass rocker lug couplings coupled in 50 ft. lengths with National <br />Standard thread. Two 10 ft. lengths of 4~" hard suction Bose <br /> <br />Couplings to be furnished by the City of Santa Ans. In addition, <br />bids are invited on unit price for additional 50 ft. lengths of 2~" <br /> <br />hose with couplings as specified in the basic bid. Bids to be <br /> <br />In Re <br />Condemnation <br />South half Richland <br />St., west of Shelton <br /> <br />February 2, 1953. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by Dahl and carried, the City <br /> <br />Attorney and Engineer'were instructed to p~epa~e necessary Resolution <br />for condemnation to acquire the south half of Richland Street fo~ aa <br /> <br />approximate distance of 100 feet west of Shelton Street, and present <br /> <br />In Re <br />Resol. No. 53-~ <br />Agreement with <br />Pac.Elec. Ry. Co. <br /> (Grade crossings at <br />Orange Ave.) <br /> <br /> to the Council at the next meeting. <br /> <br />.On motion of Trustee Dahl, seconded by Jerome and carried, the <br /> <br />ing Resolution entitled: <br /> <br />"Authorizing the execution of an agreement <br />with the Pacific Electric Railway Company <br />for the construction of two at grade crossings" <br /> <br />was read, considered, designated Resolution No. 53-4 and passed by <br /> <br />following vote: <br />Ayes, Trustees <br /> <br />Noes, Trustees <br />Absent, Trustees <br /> <br /> William Jerome, J.L.McBride, <br />.~ilford W. Dahl, Courtney R. <br /> None <br /> None <br /> <br />Orson H. Hunter, <br />Chandler. <br /> <br /> <br />