My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
09/17/2024
>
Item 22 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2024 10:27:39 AM
Creation date
9/11/2024 11:16:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
22
Date
9/17/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Related Bristol Mixed -Use Project CEQA Findings of Fact <br />conclusions set forth in the GPU FEIR, which determined that impacts related to landslides would be <br />less than significant (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.4-10). <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of <br />septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the <br />disposal of wastewater (Draft Supplemental EIR at 5.4-1 3). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site is currently connected to the City's sewer system. As <br />detailed in Draft Supplemental EIR Chapter 3.0, Project Description, the Project would install a new <br />onsite sewer system that would connect to the existing 78-inch sewer in Sunflower Avenue. The <br />proposed Project would not use septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. As a result, <br />no impacts related to septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would occur from <br />implementation of the proposed Project. Therefore, impacts related to Project buildout of the site <br />would be less than the impact conclusions set forth in the GPU FEIR, which determined that impacts <br />related to septic tanks would be less than significant (Draft Supplemental EIR at 5.4-1 3). <br />D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous <br />materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a <br />significant hazard to the public or the environment (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.6-26). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (included as Appendix J <br />to the Draft Supplemental EIR) that was conducted database searches to determine if the Project <br />area or any nearby properties are identified as currently having hazardous materials. The record <br />searches determined that although the site has a history of various uses and identified as previously <br />generating hazardous wastes and clean-up activities, the Project site is not located on or near by <br />a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section <br />65962.5. As a result, impacts related to hazards from being located on or adjacent to a hazardous <br />materials site would not occur from implementation of the proposed Project (Draft Supplemental EIR <br />at p. 5.6-26). <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not expose people or structures either directly or indirectly to a <br />significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildfires (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.6-29). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site is located within an urban developed area and is not <br />located within an identified wildland fire hazard area and is not an area where residences are <br />intermixed with wildlands. In addition, implementation of the proposed Project would be required <br />to adhere to the following chapters of the City's Municipal Code to reduce potential fire hazards: <br />Chapter 8.2 Uniform Building Code, Chapter 8.4 Uniform Mechanical Code, Chapter 8.5 National <br />Electric Code, and Chapter 14 City of Santa Ana Fire Code. Additionally, the Project would be in <br />compliance with any further guidelines from the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) related to <br />fire prevention and is subject to permit approval by the City's Building Division. Therefore, the <br />proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death <br />from wildfires and no impacts would occur (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.6-29). <br />City of Santa Ana 7 <br />CEQA Findings of Fact <br />September 2024 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.