My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #22 - Response to Late Comments
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
09/17/2024
>
Correspondence - #22 - Response to Late Comments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2024 9:56:40 AM
Creation date
9/17/2024 6:45:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Letter CC4: Louis Steers (2 pages) Late Comment letter <br />Flores, Dora <br />From: Louis Steers < <br />Sent: Monday, September 16, 2024 3:13 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: Agenda Item #22 <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />I strongly urge a non approval of various entitlements to facilitate the <br />establishment of a new Specific Plan (SP) and construction of new, mixed <br />use urban village for the following concerns: <br />1. Current congestion on Bristol and MacArthur and to my knowledge no <br />plan to widen current streets. This project will cause more traffic issues <br />for the residents residing in neighborhoods around the proposed urban <br />village. <br />2. The proposed tenants of the urban village will take away the <br />"affordable" shopping for current neighborhood residents and favor more <br />upscale establishments and discriminate against the current population of <br />the neighborhood. In addition it will cause an increase in vehicle traffic as <br />residents commute to the stores in their price range. <br />3. The village's proposed 3750 residential units, 200 units of senior <br />continuum of care living, 250 room key hotel and the 350,000 square feet <br />of commercial space is astronomical increase of population on the <br />proposed site which the 13.1 acres of publicly accessible open space does <br />not remediate <br />4. Although Independent this urban village is parallel to the other <br />"village" planned for Bear and Sunflower with increased housing and <br />office space which will further increase traffic congestion on McArthur, <br />Bristol, Bear and Sunflower. <br />I encourage all planning commission and council members to physically <br />be present in the neighborhood and see what I am addressing. Backed up <br />traffic getting on to freeways on Bear and commute traffic coming off the <br />freeways on both Bear and Bristol. <br />0 <br />CC4.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.