My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Correspondence - #26
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Staff Correspondence - #26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:11:46 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 9:16:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Alcala, Abigail <br />From:Thai, Minh <br />Sent:Tuesday, September 24, 2024 5:40 PM <br />To:Thai, Minh <br />Cc:Nunez, Alvaro; sonia.carvalho@bbklaw.com; Mendoza, Steven; Vazquez, Sylvia; <br />Pezeshkpour, Ali; Crosthwaite, Melissa; Hall, Jennifer <br />Subject:For your information: Excerpt from the October 1st City Council Staff Report <br />regarding the Continued Public Hearing on the Related Bristol Project <br />Attachments:image001.png; image002.jpg; image003.jpg; Exhibit 21 - Applicant Responses to City <br />Council September 17 Questions.pdf; Exhibit 22 - City Responses to City Council <br />September 17 Questions.pdf <br /> <br />Mayor Amezcua and Members of the City Council (bcc), <br /> <br />st <br />To streamline the review process for the upcoming October 1 Staff Report regarding the Related Bristol Specific Plan <br />Project, staff is providing the excerpt below. This highlights only the new supplemental information added, leaving out <br />the rest of the report which contains information previously provided as part of the September Staff Report. <br /> <br />“At its regular meeting on September 17, 2024, the City Council received a staff presentation, opened <br />the public hearing, and took public comments on the item. A total of 37 individuals spoke on the <br />item, including three individuals representing the applicant and two representing onsite land <br />ownership. Comments ranged from those in support, those without a clear position, and those <br />opposed. The nature of the comments in support focused on opportunities to develop the site with a <br />new, mixed-use village that would generate positive impacts for the City and surrounding <br />communities, while those with no clear position or in opposition focused on concerns surrounding <br />traffic, increases in rent, and the lack of project labor agreements. <br /> <br />Following public comments, the public hearing was closed and the item returned to the City Council <br />for discussion. City Council members posed nine (9) questions about the project for follow-up by the <br />applicant and staff, after which the City Council unanimously voted to continue the matter to the <br />regularly scheduled meeting of October 1, 2024”. <br /> <br />In addition to the above information, also attached for your reference are the new Exhibits 21 and 22 to the Report. <br /> <br />1. Exhibit 21 outlines the City Council questions to the applicant and their responses. <br />2. Exhibit 22 outlines the City Council questions for staff and contains staff responses. <br /> <br />Please let me know if I can further assist with your review of the information. <br /> <br />Best regards, <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.