My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Correspondence - #26
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Staff Correspondence - #26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:11:46 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 9:16:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit 22: City Council Questions to Staff from September 17, 2024 Hearing <br /> Public art and a public art fee(public art design and locations ultimately <br />addressed in the Specific Plan document, Section 5.11) <br />Contribution of funding towards making repairs and upgrades to existing <br />fire stations owned by the City <br /> “Green” building and site design features, such as water conservation, <br />Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) building designs, <br />electric vehicle parking, electric appliances, photovoltaic panels, ecology <br />and wellness, street improvements, utility enhancements, and traffic <br />improvements (ultimately included in the Specific Plan document, Sections <br />5.8 and 5.9) <br /> Formation of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) <br /> Multiple options to comply with the Affordable Housing Opportunity <br />Creation Ordinance (AHOCO) <br /> <br />The ad hoc committee originally stood firm in negotiations on the fact that it <br />encouraged Related to commit to entering into a Project Labor Agreement. <br />Ultimately, it was decided that requiring such an agreement would unfairly impact <br />discussions and negotiations between Related and the union representatives. <br />Related assured the ad hoc committee that it would work with the unions and that <br />upon presentation of the project to the City Council they would work to ensure <br />that the unions supported the project as being in the best interests of the <br />community and union workers. <br /> <br /> <br />6. Will the City’s CWA requirements apply to the project? <br /> <br />No; the City’s CWA requirements only apply to public improvement projects and <br />affordable housing projects that are built by the City or receive City funding. The <br />public improvements required of the development are being built by the <br />developer at the developer’s cost with no funding from the City. <br /> <br />However, the CWA does apply to City public improvement projects. As such, the <br />CWA would apply to the offsite public infrastructure work that the City will <br />generally construct, including work for which the Developer will pay a <br />proportionate share of the costs. Public infrastructure anticipated by the City <br />includes storm drain line extensions, street intersection improvements, water and <br />sewer improvements, etc. The value of such improvements was previously <br />estimated by DTA to be approximately $80 million. <br /> <br /> <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.