My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2024 9:08:11 AM
Creation date
9/25/2024 3:28:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Alcala, Abigail <br />From:Wynter Incitti <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> <br />Sent:Monday, September 23, 2024 9:48 AM <br />To:eComment <br />Subject:Focus on Prevention & Rehabilitation, Not Punishment! Oppose Proposition 36! <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Santa Ana City Council, <br />Dear Mayor Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council, <br />As a resident of Santa Ana, I urge you to vote NO on the proposed resolution supporting <br />Proposition 36. Supporting Proposition 36 would have negative consequences for Santa <br />Ana’s most vulnerable residents and undo years of progress in criminal justice reform. This <br />measure, which emphasizes punishment, would lead to higher incarceration rates, especially <br />affecting communities of color, worsening racial inequities. <br />Proposition 47, passed in 2014, has saved over $800 million and reduced racial disparities by <br />redirecting funds to essential services like mental health care and homelessness prevention. <br />Programs such as Project Kinship and Neutral Ground have helped residents reintegrate <br />post-incarceration, reducing recidivism and promoting public safety. <br />Endorsing Proposition 36 would return us to the failed “tough on crime” policies, increasing <br />the prison population and racial disparities without addressing root causes of crime like <br />poverty and substance use. Proposition 36 would also divert critical funds from education, <br />housing, and job training, worsening homelessness and economic instability in the City. <br />As a sanctuary city, Santa Ana must protect its immigrant and refugee populations. <br />Proposition 36 could increase deportations and family separations, disproportionately <br />harming immigrant communities. Instead of supporting this costly and ineffective measure, <br />we urge the City to continue focusing on justice and rehabilitation. Please vote NO on the <br />proposed resolution supporting Proposition 36 and support evidence-based solutions for <br />safer, healthier communities. <br />Wynter Incitti <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.