My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 15 - Large Water Services Vault and Meter Apparatus Improvements
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/15/2024
>
Item 15 - Large Water Services Vault and Meter Apparatus Improvements
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 5:42:10 PM
Creation date
10/8/2024 4:55:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
15
Date
10/15/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(9) <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Incomplete proposals will be deemed <br />as nonresponsive and will be rejected. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals <br />submitted and no representation is made hereby that any commitment will be awarded pursuant <br />to this RFP or otherwise. <br />PLEASE NOTE: <br />All forms above must be signed by a representative of the Firm that is legally <br />authorized to contractually bind the Proposer. <br />• City will not waive notarization requirement when applicable on any of the required <br />attachments. <br />VII. REFERENCES <br />Contractor shall provide three (3) references from other similar public agencies for which services <br />similar to those specified in this RFP have been performed, including contact names and <br />telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B — References. The respondent grants permission <br />for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br />City may disqualify a Proposer if. <br />• References fail to substantiate Proposer's description of services and <br />deliverables provided; or <br />• References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing <br />capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or <br />• City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the <br />Proposer's responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City <br />working hours. <br />VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE <br />See EXHIBIT H — Sample Agreement <br />IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will <br />evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined <br />directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.